Re: [[RFC] Netcfg add support for WPA 0/4]

2008-05-07 Thread Frans Pop
(No need to CC me; I read the list.) On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Glenn Saberton wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > AFAICT your patches assume that wpasupplicant is available. > > Do you also have a patch to add a udeb for that? > > If so: > > - what size is it (both the udeb itself and when installed)? >

Re: [[RFC] Netcfg add support for WPA 0/4]

2008-05-07 Thread Glenn Saberton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 02 May 2008, Glenn Saberton wrote: >> Hopefully I have addressed the issues pointed out so far. The first >> two patches don't change netcfg's behaviour, the third adds wpa >> support and the last kills it with kill() rathe

Re: [[RFC] Netcfg add support for WPA 0/4]

2008-05-07 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 02 May 2008, Glenn Saberton wrote: > Hopefully I have addressed the issues pointed out so far. The first > two patches don't change netcfg's behaviour, the third adds wpa > support and the last kills it with kill() rather than the shell > script. I will work on adding functionality to all

Re: [[RFC] Netcfg add support for WPA 0/4]

2008-05-06 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:48:10PM +0800, Glenn Saberton wrote: > Hopefully I have addressed the issues pointed out so far. The first > two patches don't change netcfg's behaviour, the third adds wpa > support and the last kills it with kill() rather than the shell > script. Good. :) Your submiss

[[RFC] Netcfg add support for WPA 0/4]

2008-05-02 Thread Glenn Saberton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hopefully I have addressed the issues pointed out so far. The first two patches don't change netcfg's behaviour, the third adds wpa support and the last kills it with kill() rather than the shell script. I will work on adding functionality to allow net