Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2024-04-30 at 23:31 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> CVE-2023-52160 security bug
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Cyril Brulebois (2015-08-16):
> Iain R. Learmonth (2015-08-16):
> > Control: tags 784045 + patch
> > Control: tags 784045 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for debian-installer-launcher (versioned as 21+nmu1)
> >
Hi,
Iain R. Learmonth (2015-08-16):
> Control: tags 784045 + patch
> Control: tags 784045 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for debian-installer-launcher (versioned as 21+nmu1)
> and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if
Control: tags 784045 + patch
Control: tags 784045 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for debian-installer-launcher (versioned as 21+nmu1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Thanks,
Iain.
--
e: i...@fsfe.org
Processing control commands:
> tags 784045 + patch
Bug #784045 [debian-installer-launcher] debian-installer-launcher needs to
depend on sudo
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 784045 + pending
Bug #784045 [debian-installer-launcher] debian-installer-launcher needs to
depend on sudo
Added tag(s) pending.
-pick to fix load_env if
the grubenv file spans more than one block. I'm not aware of any new
issues caused by this.
diff -Nru grub2-2.02~beta2/debian/.git-dpm grub2-2.02~beta2/debian/.git-dpm
--- grub2-2.02~beta2/debian/.git-dpm2015-01-03 12:21:02.0 +
+++ grub2-2.02~beta2/debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 761149 newcomer
Bug #761149 [qa.debian.org] debsources: allow redirects to package versions
based on suite/codename
Added tag(s) newcomer.
> tag 762951 newcomer
Bug #762951 [qa.debian.org] debsources: increase/maximize test coverage
Added tag
Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:44:06 +0200
with message-id <20121001044406.gh5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689228: zh_TW translation for the 9/21 update
has caused the Debian Bug report #689228,
regarding zh_TW translation for the 9/21 update
to be marked a
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20120828
Hi. Attached is the zh_TW translation of d-i for the 9/21 update.
Please tell me if there is any problem, or commit if everything is OK.
Thank you.
--
Best regards,
imacat ^_*'
PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
<>
Hello,
I have tested this image.
This build finished at Fri Jan 21 09:12:54 UTC 2011.
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/sparc/iso-cd/debian-testing-sparc-netinst.iso
It still has the same problem.
console [tty0] enabled, bootconsole disabled
after this nothing
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #272903
has caused the Debian Bug report #272903,
regarding Sarge Installer from 9-21-04
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
FYI: The status of the partman-efi source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20
Current version: 21
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will re
Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:18:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#569389: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.14
has caused the Debian Bug report #569389,
regarding win32-loader: FTBFS: plugins/cpuid/plugin.c:18:21: error: windows.h:
No such file or directory
to be marked as done
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (did...@raboud.com):
>
>> My alioth login is odyx-guest, as I'm no DD.
>
> I granted Didier with commit access yesterday.
>
> Didier, when you feel an upload is needed, just ask.
>
>> Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM).
>
>
> T
Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (did...@raboud.com):
> My alioth login is odyx-guest, as I'm no DD.
I granted Didier with commit access yesterday.
Didier, when you feel an upload is needed, just ask.
> Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM).
That could include adding you to Uploaders and DM
Le mercredi 21 avril 2010 18:08:33, vous avez écrit :
> (are you subscribed to -boot?)
Hi,
yes, through Gmane.
> Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (did...@raboud.com):
> > Yay, thanks KiBi for those warm words.
> >
> > FYI, Robert's mail bounced, I just rese
(are you subscribed to -boot?)
Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (did...@raboud.com):
> Yay, thanks KiBi for those warm words.
>
> FYI, Robert's mail bounced, I just resent it on two other addresses of him.
> If I get access to the SVN, I will try to improve things incrementally: if
> one objects t
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Christian PERRIER (20/04/2010):
>> From the activity I've seen on win32-loader last months, I think it
>> would be very welcomed and, unless we get strong objections from
>> Robert, I'd be ready to grant you commit access to D-I SVN so that
>> you can help.
>
Hi all.
Christian PERRIER (20/04/2010):
> From the activity I've seen on win32-loader last months, I think it
> would be very welcomed and, unless we get strong objections from
> Robert, I'd be ready to grant you commit access to D-I SVN so that
> you can help.
I'm not quite inside -boot@ but an
Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (did...@raboud.com):
> package win32-loader
> tags 569389 +patch
> thanks
I'll commit that ASAP. I'd prefer Robert to upload, but without news,
I think that an NMU is perfectly safe.
> By the way, the package is in some need of love (standards, lintian, [cdbs vs
> dh
Os plugins/cpuid/cpuid.c plugins/cpuid/plugin.c
> > -Wl,--file-alignment,512 -Werror -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0500
> > -L/usr/i586-mingw32msvc/lib/nsis -lpluginapi -shared -o
> > plugins/cpuid/test64.dll plugins/cpuid/plugin.c:18:21: error: windows.h:
> > No such file or directory In file in
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
gt; plugins/cpuid/plugin.c:18:21: error: windows.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from
> /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.4.2/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/include/nsis/pluginapi.h:8,
> from plugins/cpuid/plugin.c:22:
> /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.4.
Quoting Deng, Xiyue (manp...@gmail.com):
> Thanks Christian for the notice, and thank you Su Yunqiang for the
> translation update. I have been quite busy in the passing months, and
> it seems to keep it that way for some longer time, so it is great to
> have more people working on this. I have
On 12/29/09 3:03 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting yq s (wzss...@gmail.com):
>> with a small script that download pots and msgmerge them.
>> it maybe have a little use.
>> Due to gmail can recongize gz and find it is a script and refuse it,i
>> compress it to lz.
>
>
> As I wrote a few day
Quoting yq s (wzss...@gmail.com):
> with a small script that download pots and msgmerge them.
> it maybe have a little use.
> Due to gmail can recongize gz and find it is a script and refuse it,i
> compress it to lz.
As I wrote a few days ago, I would like to get Deng Xiyue's agreement
before
Quoting yq s (wzss...@gmail.com):
> with a small script that download pots and msgmerge them.
> it maybe have a little use.
> Due to gmail can recongize gz and find it is a script and refuse it,i
> compress it to lz.
I need to have a look at this and check with the usual translator.
That will
* Christian Perrier [2009-11-19 22:54]:
> I suggest to people interested in that release to try being active on
> IRC during the upcoming week-end, if they can (I can't). We're really
> desperately missing immediate and direct communication these days
I agree. In particular, we need more sta
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
The subject says it all.
During last meeting, Otavio and I agreed to have a short status
meeting today at 21:30, but the meeting time was apparently missed...
So, I unilateraly reschedule a release preparation meeting for next
Monday at 21:00 UTC.
I suggest to people interested in that release
As usual:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Friday 06 November 2009, vincent.mcint...@csiro.au wrote:
> I want to install lenny with the 'squeeze' installer.
> Are you saying all I need to preseed is suite=lenny on the boot line?
Yep.
BUT I doubt anyone has tested that the squeeze installer really still is
compatible with lenny. The ri
On Friday 06 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Actually, I suspect that you had an old daily image (which is based on
> *unstable*) that still used the 2.6.31-1 kernel while the udebs for that
> kernel no longer existed in unstable because they had been updated to
> 2.6.31-2.
Eh, we don't have ude
On Friday 06 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Found the problem, which is documented but it's somewhat difficult
> > to parse. This change in my preseed file fixed the issue:
> >
> > - d-i mirror/udeb/suite string lenny
> > + d-i mirror/udeb/suite string testing
>
> This is not a b
Your message dated Fri, 6 Nov 2009 06:20:22 +0100
with message-id <200911060620.23290.elen...@planet.nl>
and subject line #552787 [i386][squeeze][20091026-21:55] unable to install
lenny from daily
has caused the Debian Bug report #552787,
regarding [i386][squeeze][20091026-21:55] una
Found the problem, which is documented but it's somewhat difficult
to parse. This change in my preseed file fixed the issue:
- d-i mirror/udeb/suite string lenny
+ d-i mirror/udeb/suite string testing
Cheers
Vince
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian
Package: installation-reports
Version: [i386][squeeze][20091026-21:55]
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/debian-installer/i386/
20091026-21
FYI: The status of the partman-newworld source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20lenny1
Current version: 21
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
Even though D-I team meetings are scheduled on first and third Mondays
of each month at 20:00 UTC, *the next meeting will be on TUESDAY April
21st at 21:00 UTC*.
Please refer to http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings for
more information.
That meeting is meant to finish going through
this, and mostly in order to prepare ourselves to the challenges
of squeeze development, we decided about a team meeting on March 16th
21:00 UTC. That meeting will happen on the #debian-boot IRC channel.
A (scarce) meeting agenda is available on
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings/Co
ch a point where we can continue
developing that major piece of Debian.
For this, and mostly in order to prepare ourselves to the challenges
of squeeze development, we decided about a team meeting on March 16th
21:00 UTC. That meeting will happen on thea #debian-boot IRC channel.
A (scarce) meet
we have to face and solve in order to reach a point where we can
> continue developing that major piece of Debian.
>
> For this, and mostly in order to prepare ourselves to the challenges
> of squeeze development, we decided about a team meeting on March 16th
> 21:00 UTC. That m
development, we decided about a team meeting on March 16th
21:00 UTC. That meeting will happen on #debian-boot IRC channel.
A (scarce) meeting agenda is available on
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings/Coordination.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
There will be a quick meeting on #debian-boot at irc.debian.org on
Tuesday 11 November 2008 at 21:00 UTC to follow up the previous one.
Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:00:00 -0800 US/Pacific
Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:00 -0500 US/Eastern
Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:00:00 -0200 Brazil/East
Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:00:00 +
On Saturday 08 November 2008, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:28:51PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >There will be a Debian Installer Meeting on Friday 7 November 2008 at
> >21:00 UTC.
Sorry folks,
I've seen the log of the meeting, I&
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:28:51PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>There will be a Debian Installer Meeting on Friday 7 November 2008 at
>21:00 UTC.
>
>More information is available at the wiki page below.
>
>http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings/Coordinati
There will be a Debian Installer Meeting on Friday 7 November 2008 at
21:00 UTC.
More information is available at the wiki page below.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings/Coordination
Please add your agenda items at the above wiki page where you could find
a number of agenda items
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
FYI: The status of the partman-jfs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20
Current version: 21
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
-
Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 13 January 2007 10:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Since i810 isn't simply supported by vesafb, a way out for this could
be providing i810fb module in the installer/ in the kernel and loading
it at boot time when i810 chip is detected.
Tests on my laptop showed tha
On Saturday 13 January 2007 10:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Since i810 isn't simply supported by vesafb, a way out for this could
> be providing i810fb module in the installer/ in the kernel and loading
> it at boot time when i810 chip is detected.
Tests on my laptop showed that it is absolutel
Frans Pop wrote:
reassign 405737 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
retitle 405737 G-I does not support some i810 graphics cards
thanks
On Sunday 07 January 2007 15:03, Roy Francis wrote:
If I simply insmod a precompiled i810fb.ko, will it work ?
I've been testing a bit with that, but at least on my laptop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 405737 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#405737: Installation report : etch(daily build 20070103-21:52 ) installgui
fails on i810
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
> retitle 405737 G-I does not s
reassign 405737 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
retitle 405737 G-I does not support some i810 graphics cards
thanks
On Sunday 07 January 2007 15:03, Roy Francis wrote:
> If I simply insmod a precompiled i810fb.ko, will it work ?
I've been testing a bit with that, but at least on my laptop (which seems
to nee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> many video cards simply aren't supported by
> vesafb, so we implemented a sw fallback to the textual frontend for
> those cases.
Hmm, I suspect some fallback are not strictly related to the driver.
I just tried today to boo
Roy Francis wrote:
On 1/8/07, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a tipical case of vesafb not being able to start because of
unsupported video card: many video cards simply aren't supported by
vesafb, so we implemented a sw fallback to the textual frontend for
those cases.
M
On 1/8/07, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a tipical case of vesafb not being able to start because of
unsupported video card: many video cards simply aren't supported by
vesafb, so we implemented a sw fallback to the textual frontend for
those cases.
My question is: why th
Roy Francis wrote:
On 1/7/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 21:01, Roy Francis wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> I am using the daily-build netinst image burnt onto a CDRW using
> cdrecord. Once the bootsplash is shown, I used installgui at
> bo
On 1/7/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 21:01, Roy Francis wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> I am using the daily-build netinst image burnt onto a CDRW using
> cdrecord. Once the bootsplash is shown, I used installgui at
> boot-prompt. Booting
Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 21:01, Roy Francis wrote:
Comments/Problems:
I am using the daily-build netinst image burnt onto a CDRW using
cdrecord. Once the bootsplash is shown, I used installgui at
boot-prompt. Booting is perfect in all respects until the framebuffer
On Friday 05 January 2007 21:01, Roy Francis wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> I am using the daily-build netinst image burnt onto a CDRW using
> cdrecord. Once the bootsplash is shown, I used installgui at
> boot-prompt. Booting is perfect in all respects until the framebuffer
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 405737 installation-reports
Bug#405737: Installation report : etch(daily build 20070103-21:52 ) installgui
fails on i810
Warning: Unknown package 'report'
Warning: Unknown package 'installgui'
Warning: Unknown package
Package: installation-reports (bug report : installgui fails)
Boot method: CD
Image version: Debian GNU/Linux testing "Etch" - Official Snapshot
i386 NETINST Binary-1 20070103-21:52 (/.disk/info)
Date: Jan 5 22:59:22 (IST)
Machine: Assembled PC x86.
Processor: Intel Pentium I
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 13:22, you wrote:
> I had send this message but it came back undeliverable. So I send it
> straight to you.
Strange. Should work.
> There's already a line 'set -e' at the top of the file, so my question
> is: You mean to add 'set -x' to get:
> Or should I change the 'set -
Op Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:32:25 +0200 schreef Martin Michlmayr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The awk error is gone. The error now is:
Jan 1 03:13:18 apt-install: Setting up exim4-config (4.62-2) ...
Jan 1 03:14:01 apt-install: dpkg: error processing exim4-config
(--configure):
Jan 1 03:14:01 apt-in
* S. Voortman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-15 18:30]:
> Just finished with it.
> It still goes wrong (dependencies: exim4-config, *base, *daemon-light, at,
> exim4, mutt, mailx), but the installer doesn't hang anymore! It now goes
> on and finally turns up a red screen:
The awk error is gone.
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-12 21:57]:
> On Wednesday 12 July 2006 13:02, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > It was a daily netinst image from July 7 or 8. syslog is attached.
> > The arch is ARM.
> It looks like this is not a d-i nor a user-setup problem, but
:
apt-install: bozo: cast on bad type
[...]
in-target: Adding system-user for exim (v4)
in-target: chage: the shadow password file is not present
in-target: chage failed with return code 15, shadow not enabled, password
aging cannot be set. Continuing.
in-target: awk: line 21:
in-target: syntax er
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
!!! There were errors during the build process.
!!! Please check the log and correct the errors.
Only architectures (if any) that were built correctly have been uploaded.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i_manual/log/en.log
===
It is possible to u
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The next Debian Installer team opened meeting is scheduled for
> Wednesday April 5th 21:00 UTC.
OK. It appears that *I* actually completely forgot about this:
-no reminder posted
-not connected when the meeting was supposed to happen
The next Debian Installer team opened meeting is scheduled for
Wednesday April 5th 21:00 UTC.
We are currently between two releases. A beta3 release is planned
"soon" for offering a better support for the recent mirror split. We
also plan to integrate the graphical installer in th
On Sunday 05 March 2006 01:42, David B van Balen wrote:
> Is there a way to begin the install, fetch the correct modules off the
> install CD and load them without going through the installer's net
> config steps? I ran a 'find' on the CD for substring 8139 but came up
> with nothing, so I assume t
> Mmm, 8139cp _and_ 8139too
> I wonder why twice a simular NIC driver ?
I tried unloading 8139cp and still couldn't get an ip address. I also tried
unloading everything directly related to the network card and then reloading
everything except 8139cp, but still no dice.
Is there a way to begin
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 05:05:16PM -0500, David B van Balen wrote:
> The installer appears to recognize my card
> (Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd RTL-8139/813/8139C+ (rev 10)) properly
> and load the correct modules (8139cp, 8139too, mii, eth1394, ieee1394)
> during the "Detect Network Hardware" s
I'm attempting a Debian install on a Compaq desktop that I purchased late last
year. I've managed to coax it through almost all the process (including a
3-day-long partitioning/formatting process for my 250GB HDD), but I'm stuck at
the "Install the base system" step because I can't get networkin
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://home.tiscali.nl/isildur/d-i/log/en.log
===
New in this theater: thes
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://home.tiscali.nl/isildur/d-i/log/en.log
===
If you would prefer this
Conger, Chris A. wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> ALL good except my pcmcia ne2000 netcard hung the reboot until I pulled it
> out. After getting booted up it hotplugs fine.
Is this the boot of the installer, or the boot of the installed system,
or both?
> Have seen this bug before
> but not in re
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 9-21-04
uname -a: 2.4.27-1-i386
Date: 9-22-04 9AM
Method:
Status as of 07/24 21:30UTC, 2:30 hours left
33 complete languages
zh_TW, zh_CN, uk, tr, sv, sk, ru, ro, pt_BR, pt, pl, nn, nl, lt, ko, ja, it,
id, hu, hr, he, fr, fi, eu, es, el, de, da, cy, cs, ca, bg, ar
03 nearly complete
sq (99.65%), nb (97.79%), bs (95.73%)
03 partial
sl (84.54%), gl
Wenn Sie keine News mehr erhalten möchten, gehen Sie bitte auf unsere Homepage. Mit
einem Klick können Sie sich sofort wieder austragen.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 249786 + fixed
Bug#249786: Should use a minimum size for the root partition
Tags were: pending d-i
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
tag 249786 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 18:52:33 +0200
Source: partman-auto
Binary: partman-auto
Architecture: source
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 3-21-04 Sparc netboot snapshot.
(http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/sparc/2004-03-21/sparc32/netboot/boot.img)
uname -a: Linux superbob 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc GNU/Linux
Date: Mar 21, 2004
Install bugs report
uname -a: 2.4.25-1-386
Date: March 22, 2004
Method: Netinst CD
I have tried to install debian to /dev/hde partitions,
but have failed these days; thus I have decided to
report it. On boot prompmpt "boot:", I enter expert.
The following is my PC's basic config.
CPU: P4 1.6
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 04:12:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Thanks very much for this encouraging report, I am updating the web
> page.
>
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > We also need to decide if we're going to supply a tarball like bf did
> > for amiga, atari, and
Thanks very much for this encouraging report, I am updating the web
page.
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> We also need to decide if we're going to supply a tarball like bf did
> for amiga, atari, and mac. If no ones says anything else, that's
> probably where I'll go.
What kind of tarball is this?
--
I'm crossposting to debian-68k, but please let's follow up on
debian-boot.
All my m68k testing is with a mac, but I'm trying to make sure all the
other subarchs are properly supported also. I'm also trying to keep the
2.2.x hacks arch-independent.
The only real ugly hack I'm using to support a 2.
system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2003 22:19:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 21 17:19:09 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.actcom.co.il (smt
Package: install
Severity: grave
The 2003-10-21 i386 bootfloppy-image.img creates a kernel panic.
Last messages are BusyBox usage message which includes the `Currently
defined functions' and then there is a Kernel panic message because of
an attempt to kill init.
--
Shaul Karl,s
ons 2003-02-26 klockan 15.08 skrev Martin Quinson:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Larry Gilbert
> >
> > | Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > | > Also, having somebody with a good touch for English to go
> > | > through the templates would be nice.
> > |
> >
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Larry Gilbert
>
> | Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > Also, having somebody with a good touch for English to go
> | > through the templates would be nice.
> |
> | I wouldn't mind helping with this, but I can't seem to figure out
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Larry Gilbert
>
> | Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > Also, having somebody with a good touch for English to go
> | > through the templates would be nice.
> |
> | I wouldn't mind helping with this, but I can't seem to figure out
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:35:04 +1100
Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code is small, but as it needs libgcrypt (which needs opencdk and
> zlib) it makes it a 350kB binary, 171kB gzip'ed, which is pretty big
> for our purposes.
To be more specific, compiling statically against libopenc
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
