Re: [Fwd: Re: Mac SE/30 install problem]

2002-04-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > Jeez, how dumb am I? I was thinking of planar pixels. Packed pixels > > > should indeed be fine. > > > > And planar was the problem on the Falcon anyway. Why one bit packed pixels > > won't work on the TT is another question, but that machine has inverse > > video as default (as has the S

Re: [Fwd: Re: Mac SE/30 install problem]

2002-04-30 Thread Philip Blundell
On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 10:15, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > > Packed pixel format is in use for lots of other hardware so I'd assume it > > > > > is supported in some way? > > > > > > > > Nope, I don't think bogl supports packed pixels at all. Christian and I > > > > discussed this before if I

Re: [Fwd: Re: Mac SE/30 install problem]

2002-04-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > > Packed pixel format is in use for lots of other hardware so I'd assume it > > > > is supported in some way? > > > > > > Nope, I don't think bogl supports packed pixels at all. Christian and I > > > discussed this before if I remember right. > > Jeez, how dumb am I? I was thinking of p

Re: [Fwd: Re: Mac SE/30 install problem]

2002-04-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > Packed pixel format is in use for lots of other hardware so I'd assume it > > > is supported in some way? > > > > Nope, I don't think bogl supports packed pixels at all. Christian and I > > discussed this before if I remember right. > > I don't remember, but you may be right ;-) > But wh

Re: [Fwd: Re: Mac SE/30 install problem]

2002-04-29 Thread Philip Blundell
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 18:11, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 07:06:03PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 13:07, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Packed pixel format is in use for lots of other hardware so I'd assume it > > > is supported in some way? > >

Re: [Fwd: Re: Mac SE/30 install problem]

2002-04-29 Thread Philip Blundell
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 13:07, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Packed pixel format is in use for lots of other hardware so I'd assume it > is supported in some way? Nope, I don't think bogl supports packed pixels at all. Christian and I discussed this before if I remember right. p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: [Fwd: Re: Mac SE/30 install problem]

2002-04-29 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > I tried the newest version of the bf on ftp.debian.org on a Macintosh > > > SE/30. After the line about starting busybox, it went into an infinite > > > loop displaying "bogl: don't know screen screen type 0". > > > > Known issue; please report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I suspect it hits >

Re: [Fwd: Re: Mac SE/30 install problem]

2002-04-26 Thread Mitchell Ferschweiler
I also have an Macintosh IIci that I can test with. I tried starting linux with the video settings set to "black & white", this produced the same blog error. When I set the video mode to 256 colors before boot, the installer worked as expected. Mitchell On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 00:08, Michael Schmi

Re: [Fwd: Re: Mac SE/30 install problem]

2002-04-24 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Macintosh SE/30 32meg RAM > > BF 3.0.22 from macinstall.tar.gz off of ftp.debian.org > > tried both kernel from archive and mac sourceforge site > > boot parameters: "root=/dev/ram" > > > > Mitchell > > > > can you use a non-monochrome video mode on your mac? Not on the SE/30 - that's one