Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re: Re: ntfs resize and gtk frontends

2004-01-23 Thread Andrew Clausen
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:19:02AM +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: This patch only solves half the problem. I guess it's the important half though. (The other half is getting Parted to talk to you in custom units) Couldn't that part be used/applied until the left is done? I mean,

Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re: Re: ntfs resize and gtk frontends

2004-01-23 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:12:55PM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote: [ parted in ocaml ] I'm afraid it wouldn't be :) I would like it, if that counts! :)) One thing with O'Caml: would it make it difficult to interface libocamlparted with distro installers? I haven't used

Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re: Re: ntfs resize and gtk frontends

2004-01-23 Thread Szakacsits Szabolcs
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Andrew Clausen wrote: This is one of my favourite stories! Talking about favourites, here is my favourite challange. Since earlier ntfsresize could resize only if there weren't data after the new size, many people made the compromise ok, let's shrink here now and more

Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re: Re: ntfs resize and gtk frontends

2004-01-23 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Szakacsits Szabolcs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040123 12:49]: This is one of my favourite stories! Talking about favourites, here is my favourite challange. Since earlier ntfsresize could resize only if there weren't data after the new size, many people made the compromise ok, let's shrink here