Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-08 22:03]:
>> > No. However, I have seen someone with a mips laptop. IIRC they got a
>> > week's battery life running Debian. There are also plenty of things in
>> > the laptop to pda spectrum using arm. mips,
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-08 22:03]:
> > No. However, I have seen someone with a mips laptop. IIRC they got a
> > week's battery life running Debian. There are also plenty of things in
> > the laptop to pda spectrum using arm. mips, mipsel, arm, armel, armeb
> > should all be include
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> debian-cd only currently includes laptop-detect due to it being a
>> tasksel dependency. Changes will be needed to avoid it falling off of
>> CDs if this dependency is removed.
>
> Yes, I already mentioned that myself in the previous thread that led up to
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> +apt-install laptop-detect || true
>
> If apt-install fails here, the script should be allowed to fail.
Ack.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Friday 08 February 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > Have you ever actually _seen_ someone with a sparc laptop?
>
> No. However, I have seen someone with a mips laptop. IIRC they got a
> week's battery life running Debian. There are also plenty of things in
> the laptop to pda spectr
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> + apt-install laptop-detect || true
If apt-install fails here, the script should be allowed to fail.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Frans Pop wrote:
> Have you ever actually _seen_ someone with a sparc laptop?
No. However, I have seen someone with a mips laptop. IIRC they got a
week's battery life running Debian. There are also plenty of things in
the laptop to pda spectrum using arm. mips, mipsel, arm, armel, armeb
should all
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 08 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > 1) You did not answer my question whether laptop-detect really supports
>> > sparc. If it does not, we should not install it there (and
>> > laptop-detect should not be built for sparc).
>>
>> It doe
On Friday 08 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > 1) You did not answer my question whether laptop-detect really supports
> > sparc. If it does not, we should not install it there (and
> > laptop-detect should not be built for sparc).
>
> It does, if kernel does.
>
> Currently laptop-detect
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 08 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I plan to commit this cuple of packages tomorrow, if noone objects, to
>> address the laptop-detect issue.
>>
>> This changes laptop-detect from a dependency, on tasksel, to a
>> recommendation and let d-
On Friday 08 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I plan to commit this cuple of packages tomorrow, if noone objects, to
> address the laptop-detect issue.
>
> This changes laptop-detect from a dependency, on tasksel, to a
> recommendation and let d-i to install it. This way we avoid the
> chang
Hello,
I plan to commit this cuple of packages tomorrow, if noone objects, to
address the laptop-detect issue.
This changes laptop-detect from a dependency, on tasksel, to a
recommendation and let d-i to install it. This way we avoid the
changing of tasksel to architecture dependent package and s
12 matches
Mail list logo
