Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-05-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100521 08:01]: > On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > I also fixed hppa today > > > > Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since > > initial run. > > Ping. hppa is still not bein

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 21 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > I also fixed hppa today > > > > Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since > > initial run. > > Ping. hppa is still not being built a

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I also fixed hppa today > > Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since > initial run. Ping. hppa is still not being built automatically. TIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-05-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > I also fixed hppa today Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since initial run. TIA, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-05-09 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100509 18:44]: > On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I just reenabled powerpc btw > > Does not seem to have been built since 3 Apr. Forgot to enable in crontab? should be ok now. I also fixed hppa today, and will fix ppc soon. Andi -- To UNSU

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-05-09 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > I just reenabled powerpc btw Does not seem to have been built since 3 Apr. Forgot to enable in crontab? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-04-06 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 06 April 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > I'm not sure if I understand this correctly. But i think it would be > very helpfull to debug problems if the build log of failed builds is > available somewhere and linked from the daily builds webpage. As an aside, because IIUC the build enviro

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-04-06 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 06 April 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > I'm not sure if I understand this correctly. But i think it would be > very helpfull to debug problems if the build log of failed builds is > available somewhere and linked from the daily builds webpage. Please read the daily-build script: if the

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-04-06 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 10:36:15AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > one further thing: As it is now, the helper script will abort in case > the build-script doesn't return true. > > I think it makes sense to transfer the log anyways. Does it make sense > as well to change the symlink (or: shoul

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-04-04 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100403 20:36]: > On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > > one further thing: As it is now, the helper script will abort in case > > the build-script doesn't return true. > > I think that's fine. If individual build targets fail then the build as a > who

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-04-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > one further thing: As it is now, the helper script will abort in case > the build-script doesn't return true. I think that's fine. If individual build targets fail then the build as a whole should still succeed. AFAICT what you do now is consisten

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-04-03 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100401 21:41]: > Thanks for getting amd64 going again so fast. > > On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > > As of now, we can't move the armel builds yet (as we are waiting for > > the new debian machines to be setup). I hope to not forget to mention > >

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-04-01 Thread Frans Pop
Thanks for getting amd64 going again so fast. On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > As of now, we can't move the armel builds yet (as we are waiting for > the new debian machines to be setup). I hope to not forget to mention > it once we have the new machines running. > > For i386, I d

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] the state of daily-builds

2010-04-01 Thread Andreas Barth
* Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org) [100401 19:55]: > Frans Pop wrote: > > OK. I guess we'll get back to you on that. I'd like to hear what Joey > > thinks of that as he currently runs two arches, including i386. > > I would like to get rid of the dedicated machine I have running for > the armel build