Just to reply to my own email: This is apparently fixed in discover1
1.5-10 which hasn't hit Sarge yet (Sarge currently has 1.5-9).
Cheers
Andree
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 17:49, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:00, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> > > When install
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 05:49:16PM +1000, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> Right, thanks for letting me know. I checked the discover1 bugs and this
> doesn't seem to have been reported yet. Would you agree to me filing a
> bug with severity 'serious' for this against discover1?
Please don't bother. We'
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 00:00, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> > When installing from i386 daily standard image 045028 I end up with two
> > directories /cdrom0 and /cdrom1. I believe this is in violation of FSH
> > 2.3. The same mount points also exist in /media which is where they
>
Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> When installing from i386 daily standard image 045028 I end up with two
> directories /cdrom0 and /cdrom1. I believe this is in violation of FSH
> 2.3. The same mount points also exist in /media which is where they
> really belong according to FSH 2.3.
This is because d
When installing from i386 daily standard image 045028 I end up with two
directories /cdrom0 and /cdrom1. I believe this is in violation of FSH
2.3. The same mount points also exist in /media which is where they
really belong according to FSH 2.3.
Do you agree that this is an issue? If so, has this
5 matches
Mail list logo
