On 13951 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th
>> > for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work
>> > for people?
>> Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later?
> I was assuming either 8ish
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 09:56 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
> >> > start planning for the first point release.
> >> > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precede
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 16:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> press@ - ping? :-)
...
> > Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th
> > for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work
> > for people?
I can be available as a backup for Neil if nee
press@ - ping? :-)
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > [Added some missed CCs; sigh]
> >
> > On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's
On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
>> > start planning for the first point release.
>> > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9
>> > really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have s
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:22:44PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> [Added some missed CCs; sigh]
>>
>> On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
>> >
Adam D. Barratt (2015-05-20):
> Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th
> for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work
> for people?
Provided the p-u freeze happens on time so that I can perform d-i tests ahead
of the release, that's fin
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [Added some missed CCs; sigh]
>
> On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
> > start planning for the first point release.
> >
> > We're also a litt
Hi
On 2015-05-01, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
> - I see gnutls28, linux, and wpa in pu; some testing couldn't hurt.
wpa should be safe (famous last words), as it contains only the one-line
security fix for CVE-2015-1863[1], which applies to a code path/ file not
used by the udeb (as CONFIG_P2P
[Added some missed CCs; sigh]
On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
start planning for the first point release.
We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9
really wants to take place afte
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:08:59PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > May 23/24
>
> Offline-ish on May 23.
>
Same for me.
> > May 30/31
>
> OK.
>
OK
> > June 6/7
>
> Offline on June 6, offline-ish on June 7.
>
OK
> > June 13/14
>
> Offline-ish on June 13.
>
OK
> > June 20/21
>
> OK.
(cc+=boot)
Adam D. Barratt (2015-04-30):
> As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
> start planning for the first point release.
AFAICT there haven't been too many reports of d-i being badly broken, so
there's not much to be fixed. Here's a quick brain dump for jessi
12 matches
Mail list logo
