On 2009-02-08 00:07, Luk Claes wrote:
I think it's best to delay that to r1. Can someone please provide a text
for the release notes to describe the problem, TIA?
Hi all: Please send me a paragraph of text ASAP.
(Or file a bug with the proposed text against release-notes.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 03:49:22PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2009-02-08 00:07, Luk Claes wrote:
I think it's best to delay that to r1. Can someone please provide a text
for the release notes to describe the problem, TIA?
Hi all: Please send me a paragraph of text ASAP.
(Or file a
On 2009-02-08 17:33, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Something like this:
Added.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi
We introduced a workaround by reverting a removal in the kernel to allow
the current X.Org on sparc work. However this patch is not supportable
and breaks all newer machines quite badly.
This means that we have to back it out again and the only question is if
we will do that for r0 or r1.
Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi
We introduced a workaround by reverting a removal in the kernel to allow
the current X.Org on sparc work. However this patch is not supportable
and breaks all newer machines quite badly.
This means that we have to back it out again and the only question is if
we
5 matches
Mail list logo
