Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:20:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line base-config does hostname configuration now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2003 11:09:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 17 06:09:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s40.ifi.uio.no (zot) [129.240.72.40]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19d6da-0004U7-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 06:09:26 -0500
Received: from terpstra by zot with local (Exim 4.20)
id 19d7Zo-0000q8-Qd; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:09:36 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: No hostname without netcfg
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.18
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:09:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: netcfg
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-17
Severity: normal
It would be nice if the user had a hostname after an install which does not
include networking.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux laptop9 2.5.74-mm1 #2 Fri Jul 4 05:41:14 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 201707-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2003 12:13:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 24 06:13:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail6.bluewin.ch [195.186.4.229]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AYvsZ-00071t-00; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:23:55 -0600
Received: from tigerente (213.3.130.30) by mail6.bluewin.ch (Bluewin AG 7.0.024)
id 3FBC84610047BE2C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:23:54 +0000
Received: from steinlin by tigerente with local (masqmail 0.2.20) id
1AYvpi-1oV-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Dec 2003
00:20:58 +0100
Subject: base-config does hostname configuration now
From: Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:20:58 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
As base-config now has a hostname configuration step I'm closing this
bug.
Gaudenz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
