Bug#230440: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-05-31 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On 27.V.2004 at 13:55 (+0200) Yann Dirson wrote: > > Then partition objects in memory should probably be initialized as > having no fs on them, instead of looking up the disk. This is exactly what the newer versions of partman do. > Or, maybe better, they could be initialized from disk only if

Bug#230440: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-05-27 Thread Yann Dirson
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 02:17:50PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03 > > snapshot)... > > This is very old now can you please try a new image from > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and see if that > works b

Bug#230440: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-05-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
> As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03 > snapshot)... This is very old now can you please try a new image from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and see if that works better? > - I initially have a HD with a single ext3 partition + swap (from a

Bug#230440: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed

2004-01-30 Thread Joey Hess
Package: installation-reports The following installation report was posted to debian-boot, and, according to my records, never followed up on. I am putting it in the BTS so it will not be lost. - Forwarded message from Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTE