Bug#239911: still no e2fsck+badblocks support?

2013-07-29 Thread Holger Levsen
control: retitle -1 no badblocks support control: tags -1 + wontfix Hi Christian, On Montag, 29. Juli 2013, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > ping - is this still the case? (where this=no e2fsck+badblocks support > e2fsprogs-udeb has e2fsck but not badblocks. I don't think it will > ever include it (

Processed: Re: Bug#239911: still no e2fsck+badblocks support?

2013-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 no badblocks support Bug #239911 [debian-installer] needs e2fsck+badblocks support Changed Bug title to 'no badblocks support' from 'needs e2fsck+badblocks support' > tags -1 + wontfix Bug #239911 [debian-installer] no badblocks support Added tag(s) wontf

Bug#239911: still no e2fsck+badblocks support?

2013-07-29 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Holger Levsen (hol...@layer-acht.org): > Hi, > > ping - is this still the case? (where this=no e2fsck+badblocks support in > d-i). Half. e2fsprogs-udeb has e2fsck but not badblocks. I don't think it will ever include it (it would increase the memory footprint of D-I for nearly no reaso

Bug#239911: still no e2fsck+badblocks support?

2013-07-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, ping - is this still the case? (where this=no e2fsck+badblocks support in d-i). cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.