Hello,
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:31:59PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
In this case, no reiserfs modules should be provided for alpha.
(Maybe the same goes for XFS.)
I've been running XFS on alphas for years with no problems (at least,
not disproportionate to the problems XFS has had
* Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-27 09:09]:
at IBM at that time did not have a clue. I never tried it since, but I
can maybe install it on a space lvm this weekend (no promises,
though).
Totally unrelated to the original problem, but since you mentioned
lvm... so LVM works on
Hello Martin,
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:15:16AM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-27 09:09]:
at IBM at that time did not have a clue. I never tried it since, but I
can maybe install it on a space lvm this weekend (no promises,
though).
Totally
* Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-27 16:26]:
Without problems. All alphas at work and my private ones have lvm
installed. The only point is that if you use BSD disklabels, there is
no predefined partition type for lvm, so we chose unknown.
Hmm, that probably means that
Hello Martin,
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:56:15AM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-27 16:26]:
Without problems. All alphas at work and my private ones have lvm
installed. The only point is that if you use BSD disklabels, there is
no predefined
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 04:08:15PM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
clone 233257 -1
reassign -1 linux-kernel-di-alpha
retitle -1 dont provide reiserfs modules
thanks
* Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-26 18:15]:
For root, you mean?
In generally the consensus seems that Reiser
6 matches
Mail list logo
