Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:21:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#254200: d-i tc1 success plus some notes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2004 16:32:20 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 13 09:32:20 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vsmtp3alice.tin.it [212.216.176.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BZXu8-0008Vp-00; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 09:32:20 -0700 Received: from localhost (82.51.122.237) by vsmtp3alice.tin.it (7.0.027) id 40AB76440012FEAE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:32:18 +0200 Received: from leo by localhost with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BZWy5-0001ZO-91 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 17:32:21 +0200 Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 17:32:21 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: d-i tc1 success plus some notes Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 6 june 2004 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux troglo 2.6.6-1-386 #1 Wed May 12 13:19:06 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 6 june2004 18:00 CET Method: boot from 110MB iso CD, linux26 Machine: acer travelmate 291lci Processor: Intel Pentium M 1.4 GHz Memory: 256MB DDR PC266 Root Device: Hitachi IC25N030ATMR04-0 IDE HD on /dev/hda Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 30.0 GB, 30005821440 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3648 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 1023 8217216 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hda2 1024 1279 2056320 c W95 FAT32 (LBA) /dev/hda3 1280 3648 19028992+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda5 1280 1887 4883728+ 83 Linux <--- /share /dev/hda6 1888 1949 497983+ 83 Linux <--- swap /dev/hda7 1950 3648 13647186 83 Linux <--- / Output of lspci and lspci -n: lspci 0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Host Bridge (rev 02) 0000:00:00.1 System peripheral: Intel Corp. 855GM/GME GMCH Memory I/O Control Registers (rev 02) 0000:00:00.3 System peripheral: Intel Corp. 855GM/GME GMCH Configuration Process Registers (rev 02) 0000:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) 0000:00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) 0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #1 (rev 03) 0000:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #2 (rev 03) 0000:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB UHCI #3 (rev 03) 0000:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 03) 0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 83) 0000:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801DBM LPC Interface Controller (rev 03) 0000:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DBM (ICH4) Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 03) 0000:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBM (ICH4) SMBus Controller (rev 03) 0000:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 03) 0000:00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp. 82801DB (ICH4) AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 03) 0000:01:00.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (rev 80) 0000:01:01.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) 0000:01:02.0 Network controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 4220 (rev 05) 0000:01:04.0 CardBus bridge: ENE Technology Inc CB1410 Cardbus Controller (rev 01) lspci -n 0000:00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:3580 (rev 02) 0000:00:00.1 Class 0880: 8086:3584 (rev 02) 0000:00:00.3 Class 0880: 8086:3585 (rev 02) 0000:00:02.0 Class 0300: 8086:3582 (rev 02) 0000:00:02.1 Class 0380: 8086:3582 (rev 02) 0000:00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:24c2 (rev 03) 0000:00:1d.1 Class 0c03: 8086:24c4 (rev 03) 0000:00:1d.2 Class 0c03: 8086:24c7 (rev 03) 0000:00:1d.7 Class 0c03: 8086:24cd (rev 03) 0000:00:1e.0 Class 0604: 8086:2448 (rev 83) 0000:00:1f.0 Class 0601: 8086:24cc (rev 03) 0000:00:1f.1 Class 0101: 8086:24ca (rev 03) 0000:00:1f.3 Class 0c05: 8086:24c3 (rev 03) 0000:00:1f.5 Class 0401: 8086:24c5 (rev 03) 0000:00:1f.6 Class 0703: 8086:24c6 (rev 03) 0000:01:00.0 Class 0c00: 1106:3044 (rev 80) 0000:01:01.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) 0000:01:02.0 Class 0280: 8086:4220 (rev 05) 0000:01:04.0 Class 0607: 1524:1410 (rev 01) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked: [O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems: [O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system: [O] Install boot loader: [O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: First of all sorry for my bad/poor english. All went well during install. Now I'm trying to tune configuration for my laptop. Here are some notes anyway: 1. After base-install I logged in. Use apt-setup to get deb sources and dist-upgrade the base system. Both aptitude (u and g key next) and apt-get (dist-upgrade) didn't install any package. Dselect instead installed 45MB of debs (lynx, gcc and so on). That seems confusing. I would prefer if they had the same behaviour. 2. netcfg: the question about domain is confusing. If I have a standalone pc with no routable domain name what should I answer? I left it blank. 3. console fonts problem. locales were correctly set but fonts were wrong (for example sone vowels with accent and some special charachters such the ones used in aptitude). First I tryed euro-support with no luck. Then I fixed the console fonts problem installing fonty. I think this package should be suggested some way during install. 4. exim4 hangs during boot process if no network is available. bug is traced as #243822 and should be fixed soon, but waiting for minutes after the first boot may scare new debian users. 5. some packages are held back in aptitude after install. There's no /etc/apt/preferences file and both dselect and apt-get upgrade them with no problems. As above it would be better if the three had the same behaviour. I have no idea of why these packages were held back, maybe a bug? 6. no discover2 yet. 7. anacron should be suggested during install. 8. hard disk is using udma33 only Anyway great job! I really liked this tc1 release. Base install is really fast and easy. I've also tried beta1 and beta2 and this release is way far better. Thanks again for your work. Leonardo Canducci --------------------------------------- Received: (at 254200-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2004 06:27:46 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 13 23:27:45 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BZkwb-0002qU-00; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 23:27:45 -0700 Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by onera.onera.fr with ESMTP id i5E6RhqC002387; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 08:27:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [127.0.0.1]) by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAF923295; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:22:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mykerinos [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03213-04; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:21:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426) id 2096523285; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:21:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:21:55 +0200 From: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#254200: d-i tc1 success plus some notes Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too. X-pot_a_miel: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at mykerinos Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This report is basically a success report with a few remarks already dealt with for most of them (the others need separate bug reports with more details, when possible, against the relevant packages) > 1. After base-install I logged in. Use apt-setup to get deb sources and > dist-upgrade the base system. Both aptitude (u and g key next) and > apt-get (dist-upgrade) didn't install any package. Dselect instead > installed 45MB of debs (lynx, gcc and so on). That seems confusing. > I would prefer if they had the same behaviour. Common and well known differences between apt/aptitude and dselect as dselect automatically selects suggested packages. apt and aptitude have an option for doing the same, but it is not the default. This issue has been discussed several times and is found less confusing. > 2. netcfg: the question about domain is confusing. If I have a > standalone pc with no routable domain name what should I answer? I left > it blank. This is a balance between simplicity and complexity in questions formulation. The current screen is what has been thought to be the less confusing wording. Of course, your mileage may vary. > 3. console fonts problem. locales were correctly set but fonts were > wrong (for example sone vowels with accent and some special charachters > such the ones used in aptitude). First I tryed euro-support with no > luck. Then I fixed the console fonts problem installing fonty. I think > this package should be suggested some way during install. This is currently work in progress in languagechooser and base-config. A few glitches remain. As you don't specifiy which language was used, it's difficult to figure out what may be done. > 4. exim4 hangs during boot process if no network is available. bug > is traced as #243822 and should be fixed soon, but waiting for minutes > after the first boot may scare new debian users. But as the bug is reported and the exim4 maintainer is a nice maintainer it wil be fixed. > 5. some packages are held back in aptitude after install. There's no > /etc/apt/preferences file and both dselect and apt-get upgrade them with > no problems. As above it would be better if the three had the same > behaviour. I have no idea of why these packages were held back, maybe a > bug? No idea. > 6. no discover2 yet. Transition in progress. > 7. anacron should be suggested during install. Why? Anyway, this is a general base system suggestion which has nothing to do directly with the Installer itself. > 8. hard disk is using udma33 only You should maybe report this as a bug against the kernel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]