Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:31:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2004 01:54:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 24 18:54:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip-202-147-43-78.asianetcom.net (alcanet.com.au) [202.147.43.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BdfvN-0005at-00; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:54:41 -0700
Received: from aumail01.alcanet.com.au (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by alcanet.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9/Alcanet1.3) with ESMTP id i5P1s3u9002686
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 11:54:04 +1000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Non creation of loopback interface leading to name resolution problems
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10 March 22, 2002
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 11:54:01 +1000
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AUMAIL01/AU/ALCATEL(Release 5.0.11 |July 24,
2002) at
06/25/2004 11:54:03,
Serialize complete at 06/25/2004 11:54:03
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000A6FAECA256EBE_="
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 000A6FAECA256EBE_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Package: debian-installer
Version: Debian Installer Sarge Test Candidate 1
I installed Debian sarge using the boot cd with the debian sarge installer
tc1. I skipped the network configuration part of the installer because my
network card is being used behind an adsl modem for connecting via PPPOE.
So no need to give an IP address to the card. The installation went
perfectly and my system is running fine as far as I'm not connected to
Internet. As soon as I get a connection via PPPOE, the application
(particulary KDE one) are very slow to start. It appeared that a lot of
dns query are done unsucessfully. I was able to fix the problem by adding
the line
my_hostname 127.0.0.1
in the /etc/hosts file and by adding the two following lines
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
in the /etc/network/interfaces file (it was completely empty before). I wonder if the
installer should
not be responsible of doing that. Even if no network configuration was
done, a loopback interface should be created, shouldn't it?
Gaetan Brichet.
--=_alternative 000A6FAECA256EBE_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Package: debian-installer</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Version: Debian Installer Sarge Test Candidate
1</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I installed Debian sarge using the boot cd with the
debian sarge installer tc1. I skipped the network configuration part of the installer
because my network card is being used behind an adsl modem for connecting via PPPOE.
So no need to give an IP address to the card. The installation went perfectly and my
system is running fine as far as I'm not connected to Internet. As soon as I get a
connection via PPPOE, the application (particulary KDE one) are very slow to start. It
appeared that a lot of dns query are done unsucessfully. I was able to fix the problem
by adding the line</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">my_hostname 127.0.0.1</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">in the /etc/hosts file and by adding the two
following lines</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Verdana"><br>
auto lo<br>
iface lo inet loopback</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">in the </font><font size=2
face="Verdana">/etc/network/interfaces</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> file (it
was completely empty before). I wonder if the installer should not be responsible of
doing that. Even if no network configuration was done, a loopback interface should be
created, shouldn't it?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Gaetan Brichet.</font>
<br>
--=_alternative 000A6FAECA256EBE_=--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 256112-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 06:40:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 23:40:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfYln-0004kP-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:40:35 -0700
Received: from aglu.demon.nl ([82.161.38.140]:65237 helo=localhost)
by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1BfYlm-000Aw4-8i
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:40:34 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F5410DE50
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:31:53 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Should be fixed
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:31:53 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This should be fixed. Please try the latest sid_d-i CD image.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
