Re: Bug#260225: Sarge installer not recognising partition table for disk larger than 137GB

2004-08-18 Thread Blars Blarson
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't know if this is relevant, but some IDE controllers only recognize the first 128 GB(binary) = 137*10^9 bytes. I've heard of one that only supportds dma on the smaller disks, and non-dma mode will work with larger disks. -- Blars

Bug#260225: Sarge installer not recognising partition table for disk larger than 137GB

2004-07-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:33:18AM +1000, Sara Falamaki wrote: On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:15:36PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: I don't know if this is relevant, but some IDE controllers only recognize the first 128 GB(binary) = 137*10^9 bytes. Is it possible that your controller has two

Re: Bug#260225: Sarge installer not recognising partition table for disk larger than 137GB

2004-07-20 Thread John Summerfield
Rick Thomas wrote: Controllers that don't believe in disks larger than 137 GB(decimal) report any disk larger than that as being exactly 137 GB in size. This is probably why cfdisk et al are telling you that your partitions go beyond the end of the disk -- as far as they know, the disk ends

Bug#260225: Sarge installer not recognising partition table for disk larger than 137GB

2004-07-19 Thread Sara Falamaki
package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040718/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux swish 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 unkown Date: Mon Jul 19 22:29:13 EST 2004 Method: downloaded image from above

Bug#260225: Sarge installer not recognising partition table for disk larger than 137GB

2004-07-19 Thread Christian Perrier
I'll paste it below for your convenience: Problems with the debian (sarge) installer For the record, after the IRC talk we had : this was reproducible on 20040718 sid_d-i image I have asked Sara to try reproducing with a 2.6 install.

Bug#260225: Sarge installer not recognising partition table for disk larger than 137GB

2004-07-19 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I'll paste it below for your convenience: Problems with the debian (sarge) installer For the record, after the IRC talk we had : this was reproducible on 20040718 sid_d-i image I have asked Sara to try reproducing with a 2.6 install.

Bug#260225: Sarge installer not recognising partition table for disk larger than 137GB

2004-07-19 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I'll paste it below for your convenience: Problems with the debian (sarge) installer For the record, after the IRC talk we had : this was reproducible on 20040718 sid_d-i image I have asked Sara to try reproducing with a 2.6 install.

Bug#260225: Sarge installer not recognising partition table for disk larger than 137GB

2004-07-19 Thread Rick Thomas
I don't know if this is relevant, but some IDE controllers only recognize the first 128 GB(binary) = 137*10^9 bytes. Is it possible that your controller has two modes? Windows uses one mode that recognizes the whole disk, and Linux uses the other (compatibility?) mode that only recognizes the

Bug#260225: Sarge installer not recognising partition table for disk larger than 137GB

2004-07-19 Thread Rick Thomas
Controllers that don't believe in disks larger than 137 GB(decimal) report any disk larger than that as being exactly 137 GB in size. This is probably why cfdisk et al are telling you that your partitions go beyond the end of the disk -- as far as they know, the disk ends before the beginning