Your message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:16:40 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382889: closed by Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Closing bug as we don't intend to change the order of questions)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:14:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bug as we don't intend to change the order of questions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
On Monday 14 August 2006 23:30, Joey Hess wrote:
> That said, I don't actually see any benefit from running user-setup
> before partman, as opposed to before apt-setup. In either case it's
> running as part of a block of questions that all happen quite close
> together with minimal wait time for th
> As far as I know there is absolutely no way to have user-setup being
> run before partman in the current way the installer is working.
Is that actually true anymore? user-setup only touches /target in
user-setup-apply; user-setup-ask seems to not need /target at all, and
user-setup-udeb doesn't
Your message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:03:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382889: debian-installer: non-optimal order of operations
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
5 matches
Mail list logo
