Hi,
Has this patch already been accepted? Any more info on how to use it, in
that case?
--
Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet,
Tim Stoop
Kumina bv
www.kumina.nl
kvk nr 14095795
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 10:26 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:11:03PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:49:57 +0100 Tom H wrote:
> > >
> > > You don't need vlan; iproute2's ip can do it:
> > >
> > > ip link add link eth0 name
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:11:03PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:49:57 +0100 Tom H wrote:
> > You don't need vlan; iproute2's ip can do it:
> >
> > ip link add link eth0 name vlan9 type vlan id 9
> > or
> > ip link add link eth0 name eth0.9 type vlan id 9
> >
Hi,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:49:57 +0100 Tom H wrote:
> You don't need vlan; iproute2's ip can do it:
>
> ip link add link eth0 name vlan9 type vlan id 9
> or
> ip link add link eth0 name eth0.9 type vlan id 9
>
>
I know that. vlan package is needed for the ifupdown hooks to parse
vlan stanza from
You don't need vlan; iproute2's ip can do it:
ip link add link eth0 name vlan9 type vlan id 9
or
ip link add link eth0 name eth0.9 type vlan id 9
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:10:51 +0800 YunQiang Su wrote:
> Thanks for Zhengpeng Hou, who points out that I leave a piece of code which is
> not used anymore in this patch. This piece of code make a more malloc while
> not
> free.
>
> And I refresh this patch with the current git.
> This is t
Tim Stoop (2014-10-29):
> Hi,
>
> We're really interested in this, where should we look for a status
> update? I still do not see an option for it in the installer for Wheezy,
> so I guess it's not done yet. Will it be present for Jessie? Anything we
> can do to help?
Philipp, any news on your s
Hi,
We're really interested in this, where should we look for a status
update? I still do not see an option for it in the installer for Wheezy,
so I guess it's not done yet. Will it be present for Jessie? Anything we
can do to help?
--
Kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Tim Stoop
Kumina bv
ww
Thanks for Zhengpeng Hou, who points out that I leave a piece of code which is
not used anymore in this patch. This piece of code make a more malloc while not
free.
And I refresh this patch with the current git.
This is the new patch.
Any one has progress on rewriting it?
vlan_new.diff
Descript
Hello,
(putting back Luca in the loop just in case)
Philipp Kern (29/12/2012):
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 08:34:27AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Taking over KiBi's hat, I would say there is no chance this makes
> > it to wheezy. And taking mine, too, with several addition to
> > localizat
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 03:41:33AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>> The Linux kernel's vlan udeb is added in linux/3.2.35-1, so there is
>> no outside thing to block us from adding vlan support to netcfg, can
>> anyone review the patch?
>
> It needs a
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 08:34:27AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Taking over KiBi's hat, I would say there is no chance this makes it
> to wheezy. And taking mine, too, with several addition to localization
> bits. The debconf templates need minor edits to compleltely fit with
> the writing sty
Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org):
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 03:41:33AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> > The Linux kernel's vlan udeb is added in linux/3.2.35-1, so there is
> > no outside thing to block us from adding vlan support to netcfg, can
> > anyone review the patch?
>
> It needs a rewrite,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 03:41:33AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> The Linux kernel's vlan udeb is added in linux/3.2.35-1, so there is
> no outside thing to block us from adding vlan support to netcfg, can
> anyone review the patch?
It needs a rewrite, IMHO. I started reviewing / rewriting it, but I'm no
Hi,
The Linux kernel's vlan udeb is added in linux/3.2.35-1, so there is
no outside thing to block us from adding vlan support to netcfg, can
anyone review the patch?
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> Hi Aron
>
> Aron Xu writes:
>
>> I'm sending a reminder on this issue, it would be best if d-i can
>> support VLAN using expert mode of installation, configuring VLAN using
>> iproute2 during installation is much more annoying comp
Hi Aron
Aron Xu writes:
> I'm sending a reminder on this issue, it would be best if d-i can
> support VLAN using expert mode of installation, configuring VLAN using
> iproute2 during installation is much more annoying comparing to
> configure it within d-i.
A reminder is nice and if you are lu
I'm sending a reminder on this issue, it would be best if d-i can
support VLAN using expert mode of installation, configuring VLAN using
iproute2 during installation is much more annoying comparing to
configure it within d-i.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:15:29PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 17-07-2007 om 16:53 schreef Luca Filipozzi:
> > Package: debian-installer
>
> meanwhile reassigned to netcfg
It depends on which level we support vlans. I see two options:
* full support with the debconf questions and proper s
Op 17-07-2007 om 16:53 schreef Luca Filipozzi:
> Package: debian-installer
meanwhile reassigned to netcfg
> vlan support in the installer would avoid this reconfiguration.
Where to find more information about vlan support?
(Please provide pointer to vlan support in debian)
Cheers
Geert Stapper
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Please consider adding vlan support to debian-installer. There are
cases (edge cases, admitedly) where machines and switches have been
configured to use vlan tagging. A reinstall of these machines requires
a network reconfiguration. vlan support in t
21 matches
Mail list logo
