There's another use case here too, in cases where I want to use my own LUKS
parameters - that the installer doesn't expose. Perhaps I want
--type=luks1, maybe I want a different --iter-time, etc. Actually, if the
installer (in expert mode) let us pass arbitrary arguments for cryptsetup
this would c
On 07/09/2019 21:25, Ben Hutchings wrote:
What makes you think the installer is intended to be used for upgrades?
Ben.
Not for upgrading an existing OS installation but it should be usable
for a fresh OS install while preserving user data. That is an important
goal in having a separate /home
On Sat, 2019-09-07 at 13:48 +0300, M Santala wrote:
[...]
> This bug has persisted for a long time and it bites long-term Debian
> users who are upgrading their systems, causing loss of time and
> data. This makes upgrade a challenge and encourages to keep obsolete
> systems in operation.
What mak
Package: partman-crypto
Followup-For: Bug #451535
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Trying to do a fresh Buster installation using "Expert install" on an
old computer with encrypted LVM volumes, with the aim of not
formatting the volumes. I was using ISO image
debian-10.0.0-amd
On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 17:37 -0300, Kolmar Kafran wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2017 21:26:28 +0100 Ben Hutchings > wrote:
>
> > It is in the nature of an installer that it is capable of
> > overwriting
> > existing data. Based on your instructions, I think the installer
> > already makes it quite clea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 15 May 2017 21:26:28 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It is in the nature of an installer that it is capable of overwriting
> existing data. Based on your instructions, I think the installer
> already makes it quite clear what's going to happe
On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 17:20 -0300, Kolmar Kafran wrote:
> severity: critical
>
> I would like to say this bug still persist on Debian Stretch.
>
> I suggest this bug to be marked as 'critical', since this could lead to
> data loss.
[...]
It is in the nature of an installer that it is capable of
severity: critical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I would like to say this bug still persist on Debian Stretch.
I suggest this bug to be marked as 'critical', since this could lead to
data loss.
The debian installer doesn't recognize a previous encrypted volume (Tested
with net
BUMP again. This is really annoying bug which disallow installing Debian
on pre-formatted disks/partitions. Any progress? Was Colin Watson
proposed patch accepted? Or what is current state of it?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 451970 + pending
Bug#451970: debian-installer: allow to 'reuse' encrypted volumes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> retitle 451970 partman-lvm: allow to 'reuse' logical volumes
Bug#451970: debian-installer: allow to 'reuse' encrypted v
clone 451535 -1
reassign -1 partman-lvm
severity -1 normal
thanks
On Monday 19 November 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> I did have one strange issue with that procedure though: after crypto and
> LVM had been activated, partman did not recognize the existing file
> systems on the logical volumes even tho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 451535 -1
Bug#451535: debian-installer: allow to 'reuse' encrypted volumes
Bug 451535 cloned as bug 451970.
> reassign -1 partman-lvm
Bug#451970: debian-installer: allow to 'reuse' encrypted volumes
Bug reassigned fr
reassign 451535 partman-crypto
severity 451535 wishlist
thanks
On Friday 16 November 2007, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I had first installed i386 system with encrypted /home and swap. Then I
> decided to install also amd64 build -- reusing both encrypted
> partitions. Although I checked out smth l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 451535 partman-crypto
Bug#451535: debian-installer: allow to 'reuse' encrypted volumes
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partman-crypto'.
> severity 451535 wishlist
Bug#451535: debian-installer:
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20070308
Severity: normal
I had first installed i386 system with encrypted /home and swap. Then I
decided to install also amd64 build -- reusing both encrypted
partitions. Although I checked out smth like 'delete data' in the
encryption setup menu, which I treat
15 matches
Mail list logo