On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:16:18AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan said:
Do you happen to know how to setup mutt to do this? I've been wondering
that
for years (usually I adjust the headers manually when someone complains, but
that doesn't work too
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 06:47:07PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT CC ME ON D-I BUG REPORTS OR LIST MAIL
Please don't drink so much coffee. It's bad for your health.
--
Robert Millan
GPLv2 I know my rights; I want my phone call!
DRM What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
On Saturday 22 March 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 06:47:07PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT CC ME ON D-I BUG REPORTS OR LIST MAIL
Please don't drink so much coffee. It's bad for your health.
I never drink any coffee, but maybe that's the problem.
Please keep
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:35:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 06:47:07PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT CC ME ON D-I BUG REPORTS OR LIST MAIL
Please don't drink so much coffee. It's bad for your health.
I
This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan said:
Do you happen to know how to setup mutt to do this? I've been wondering that
for years (usually I adjust the headers manually when someone complains, but
that doesn't work too well).
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then use 'L' to reply to a list
On Sunday 23 March 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
Please [...] read and follow the mailing list policies.
Do you happen to know how to setup mutt to do this? I've been wondering
that for years (usually I adjust the headers manually when someone
complains, but that doesn't work too well).
No,
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 08:41:35AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-02 17:43]:
IOW, disabling standard task leaves you with a brick :-)
No, that's not correct. network-console installs
PLEASE DO NOT CC ME ON D-I BUG REPORTS OR LIST MAIL
On Monday 17 March 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:50:05PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Looks like I got confused. I tried it again, and this time it worked.
Do we want to keep this bug?
Yes. Check the history. It has
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:50:05PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
It is now.
I also recall seeing it in testing when I hit this problem, but can't be sure
of that anymore.
Looks like I got confused. I tried it again, and this time it worked.
Do we want to keep this bug?
--
Robert Millan
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-02 17:43]:
IOW, disabling standard task leaves you with a brick :-)
No, that's not correct. network-console installs openssh-server in
its postinst file (or, rather, schedules openssh-server to be
installed later).
Martin Zobel just reported
On Friday 14 March 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-02 17:43]:
IOW, disabling standard task leaves you with a brick :-)
No, that's not correct. network-console installs openssh-server in
its postinst file (or, rather, schedules openssh-server
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 05:43:05PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-02 15:59]:
TYPE = network-console images, such as di-nslu2.bin, assume that
an sshd flavour will be installed in the target system, and have
no provisions to force its installation
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
TYPE = network-console images, such as di-nslu2.bin, assume that
an sshd flavour will be installed in the target system, and have
no provisions to force its installation in case it isn't selected
by user choice in tasksel.
IOW, disabling standard task
* Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-02 15:59]:
TYPE = network-console images, such as di-nslu2.bin, assume that
an sshd flavour will be installed in the target system, and have
no provisions to force its installation in case it isn't selected
by user choice in tasksel.
IOW, disabling
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 468960 installation-reports
Bug#468960: network-console type images assume sshd will be installed
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
reassign 468960 installation-reports
thanks
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
TYPE = network-console images, such as di-nslu2.bin, assume that
an sshd flavour will be installed in the target system, and have
no provisions to force its installation in case it isn't selected
by user
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:03:50PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 05:37:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
TYPE = network-console images, such as di-nslu2.bin, assume that
an sshd flavour will be installed in the target system,
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 05:37:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
TYPE = network-console images, such as di-nslu2.bin, assume that
an sshd flavour will be installed in the target system, and have
no provisions to force its installation in case it isn't
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
Robert's problem could have been a transient failure installing
openssh-server,
That's just speculation without a log of the installation.
which should have been detected rather than ignored.
Agreed. That is a weakness in the current apt-setup.
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
... but of course apt-install will be queueing at that point so such
errors will be undetectable. Hmm. Perhaps it would be nice to be able to
register some kind of callback system so that apt-install can notify
20 matches
Mail list logo
