Package: debian-installer
Version: debian armel beta3 installer on linkstation pro
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Clean installing Debian 7 with Beta3 netinstall on Linkstation Pro/Live fails
kernel install.
Started by copying uImage and initrd
Control: reassign -1 flash-kernel 3.3
Control: severity -1 serious
Suschman (20/11/2012):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: debian armel beta3 installer on linkstation pro
> Severity: grave
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Clean installing Debi
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi, and thanks for your report.
>
> u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
> situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”.
> What do others think?
Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure
Hi $Uploaders,
Christian PERRIER (29/12/2012):
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
>
> > Hi, and thanks for your report.
> >
> > u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
> > situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”.
> > What do others thin
Hi,
2013/1/2 Cyril Brulebois :
> Christian PERRIER (29/12/2012):
>> > u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
>> > situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”.
>> > What do others think?
>> Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure
* Cyril Brulebois [2013-01-02 19:50]:
> > Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure it is a
> > good idea to rely on Recommends being installed if the mkimage
> > program is required in some situations.
> >
> > I'm ready to upload flash-kernel with that fix.
>
> works for me, u
Quoting Hector Oron (hector.o...@gmail.com):
> Hi,
>
> 2013/1/2 Cyril Brulebois :
> > Christian PERRIER (29/12/2012):
>
> >> > u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
> >> > situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”.
> >> > What do others think?
>
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I disagree. flash-kernel maintains a database with information about
> each device, including a list of required packages. It will install
> those required packages. u-boot-tools is listed for the Linkstation,
> so the real question is why it's not being installed.
Loo
control: tag -1 patch
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> I disagree. flash-kernel maintains a database with information about
>> each device, including a list of required packages. It will install
>> those required packages. u-boot-tools is list
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 21:50:56 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> control: tag -1 patch
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >> I disagree. flash-kernel maintains a database with information about
> >> each device, including a list of required
control: tag -1 -patch
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Since the release is getting close, I've gone ahead with an nmu adding
>> u-boot-tools as a "real" dependency. Uploaded to delayed/5 to give
>> you a chance to do a maintainer upload if desired. Please see
>> attach
* Martin Michlmayr [2013-01-02 19:37]:
> > > Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure it is a
> > > good idea to rely on Recommends being installed if the mkimage
> > > program is required in some situations.
>
> I disagree. flash-kernel maintains a database with information a
Martin Michlmayr (04/06/2013):
> * Martin Michlmayr [2013-01-02 19:37]:
> > > > Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure it is a
> > > > good idea to rely on Recommends being installed if the mkimage
> > > > program is required in some situations.
> >
> > I disagree. flash-ke
Hello,
2013/6/5 Cyril Brulebois :
> Martin Michlmayr (04/06/2013):
>> I just received several bug reports about this issue and decided to
>> investigate.
> Many thanks!
+1
> Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any
> new such items would be spotted early? The follow
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any
> new such items would be spotted early? The following shell snippet
> seems to do the trick, and could be added to debian/rules, causing
> non-zero exit in case there are some hits?
Loïc Minier (05/06/2013):
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any
> > new such items would be spotted early? The following shell snippet
> > seems to do the trick, and could be added to debian/rules, causing
> > non-zer
* Loïc Minier [2013-06-05 13:40]:
> Yeah, I've pushed a test_db script which currently only tests for
> unknown fields (case sensitively)
Can you please upload to unstable.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 flash-kernel 3.3
Bug #693839 [debian-installer] debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel
buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'flash-kernel'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #693839 [flash-kernel] debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel
buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage
Added tag(s) patch.
--
693839: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693839
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -patch
Bug #693839 [flash-kernel] debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel
buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage
Removed tag(s) patch.
--
693839: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693839
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow..
20 matches
Mail list logo
