I haven't done it before but now I tried to replace libata.atapi_passthru16=0 
against libata.force=noncq and it was successful. Which of both solutions would 
you prefer?

time /lib/udev/ata_id --export /dev/sr0 returns:

ID_ATA=1
ID_TYPE=cd
ID_BUS=ata
ID_MODEL=ATAPI_DVD_A_DH16ABSH
ID_MODEL_ENC=ATAPI\x20\x20\x20DVD\x20A\x20\x20DH16ABSH\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20\x20
ID_REVISION=YA12
ID_SERIAL=ATAPI_DVD_A_DH16ABSH_KU0160F01110106A51F3
ID_SERIAL_SHORT=KU0160F01110106A51F3

real    0m0.009s
user    0m0.000s
sys    0m0.000s




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1361892497.22445.yahoomailclas...@web172303.mail.ir2.yahoo.com

Reply via email to