Bug#701959: segfault in vi applet (data loss possible)

2013-02-28 Thread Michael Tokarev
Package: busybox Version: 1:1.20.0-7 Severity: important Tags: upstream patch pending `P' and `p' commands in vi ("paste") results in a segfault if nothing has been put into paste buffer. This may trivially result in a loss of all changes in a file being edited. It is fixed in upstream commit 46

Bug#701959: segfault in vi applet (data loss possible)

2013-02-28 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: retitle -1 segfault in lineedit VI mode Control: severity -1 normal Sorry wrong interpretation. Now verified. The talk is not about vi applet, but about line editing facility (in particular in ash command prompt), in vi mode. This isn't an often-used mode, so the issue is much less sev

Bug#701959: segfault in vi applet (data loss possible)

2013-03-02 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Michael Tokarev (01/03/2013): > Package: busybox > Version: 1:1.20.0-7 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream patch pending > > `P' and `p' commands in vi ("paste") results in a segfault if > nothing has been put into paste buffer. This may trivially result > in a loss of all changes in a file b

Bug#701959: segfault in vi applet (data loss possible)

2013-03-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
02.03.2013 15:57, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Michael Tokarev (01/03/2013): >> Package: busybox >> Version: 1:1.20.0-7 >> Severity: important >> Tags: upstream patch pending >> >> `P' and `p' commands in vi ("paste") results in a segfault if >> nothing has been put into paste buffer. This may trivia

Processed: Re: Bug#701959: segfault in vi applet (data loss possible)

2013-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 segfault in lineedit VI mode Bug #701959 [busybox] segfault in vi applet (data loss possible) Changed Bug title to 'segfault in lineedit VI mode' from 'segfault in vi applet (data loss possible)' > severity -1 normal Bug #701959 [busybox] segfault in line