On Thu, Jan 01, 1970 at 12:49:11AM +, Martin Stigge wrote:
> Package: flash-kernel
> Version: 3.33
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I just installed flash-kernel but didn't have u-boot-tools installed. I
> believe it's the initramfs trigger that failed with the following:
>
> Generating boot s
* Ian Campbell [2015-03-24 10:11]:
> > To be honest, why not just use the packaging system metadata and stop
> > trying to reinvent it badly? We've had bugs like this reported for
> > ages, and it's not doing our users any favours. Just add it as a
> > Recommends and be done. It's not like the u-b
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 09:29 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:55:49AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:49 +, Martin Stigge wrote:
> >> That's easily resolved by installing the u-boot-tools package, but I would
> >> have expected that do be a depende
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:55:49AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:49 +, Martin Stigge wrote:
>> That's easily resolved by installing the u-boot-tools package, but I would
>> have expected that do be a dependency in that case. I see that it's a
>> Suggests, but looks rather
On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:49 +, Martin Stigge wrote:
> That's easily resolved by installing the u-boot-tools package, but I would
> have expected that do be a dependency in that case. I see that it's a
> Suggests, but looks rather essential to me.
u-boot-tools is not a strict requirement for fl
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.33
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just installed flash-kernel but didn't have u-boot-tools installed. I
believe it's the initramfs trigger that failed with the following:
Generating boot script u-boot image... /usr/sbin/flash-kernel: 348:
/usr/sbin/flash-kernel: mkimage
6 matches
Mail list logo
