Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

2017-02-11 Thread Cyril Brulebois
James Clarke (2017-02-11): > Some data points: > > alpha : Missing srm-reader in archive. Builds after adding a > locally-built .udeb to localudebs (and working around the > crazy broken mirror setup on electro [one of the local > mirrors >

Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

2017-02-10 Thread James Clarke
On 3 Feb 2017, at 15:28, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > James Clarke (2017-01-22): >> As you know, debian-installer does not build on non-release >> architectures, since it tries to build for stretch. Some architectures >> also have some of the needed udebs in the unreleased suite, such as >> sparc-uti

Re: Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

2017-02-08 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > [...] kfreebsd-* (which currently FTBFS anyway…). Regarding that, is it okay I commit to sid this specific change for kfreebsd-amd64: --- a/build/Makefile +++ b/build/Makefile @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),kfreebsd-i386) MFSROOT_LIMIT := 42m else ifeq ($(DE

Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

2017-02-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, James Clarke (2017-01-22): > As you know, debian-installer does not build on non-release > architectures, since it tries to build for stretch. Some architectures > also have some of the needed udebs in the unreleased suite, such as > sparc-utils on sparc64. The attached patch lets me build on

Bug#852215: [Debian-ports-devel] Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

2017-01-22 Thread Helge Deller
On 22.01.2017 17:03, James Clarke wrote: > As you know, debian-installer does not build on non-release > architectures, since it tries to build for stretch. Some architectures > also have some of the needed udebs in the unreleased suite, such as > sparc-utils on sparc64. The attached patch lets me

Bug#852215: [Debian-ports-devel] Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

2017-01-22 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 01/22/2017 05:21 PM, James Clarke wrote: >> Pulling packages from unreleased into main sounds like a bad idea, those >> architectures would better have their own unreleased and >> differently-versioned debian-installer IMO. > > It's still main, just unreleased/main rather than unstable/main. It

Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

2017-01-22 Thread James Clarke
On 22 Jan 2017, at 16:09, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 16:03:20 +, James Clarke wrote: >> Package: debian-installer >> Version: 20170112 >> Severity: wishlist >> Tags: patch >> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ports-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org >> >> Hi, >> As you know, debian-install

Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

2017-01-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 16:03:20 +, James Clarke wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Version: 20170112 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ports-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi, > As you know, debian-installer does not build on non-release > architectures, since it

Bug#852215: FTBFS on non-release architectures

2017-01-22 Thread James Clarke
Package: debian-installer Version: 20170112 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ports-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, As you know, debian-installer does not build on non-release architectures, since it tries to build for stretch. Some architectures also have some of the needed ud