On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 20:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 08:56 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote...
> >
> > > Is this still something we should try to get into stretch (now to
> > > late
> > > for 9.12 but might be possible for 9.13)?
> >
> >
On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 08:56 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote...
>
> > Is this still something we should try to get into stretch (now to
> > late
> > for 9.12 but might be possible for 9.13)?
>
> For me, I would like to, so I'll re-visit the scenary and will try to
>
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote...
> Is this still something we should try to get into stretch (now to late
> for 9.12 but might be possible for 9.13)?
For me, I would like to, so I'll re-visit the scenary and will try to
eventually get this done.
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 02:19:47PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:43:08PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Cyril Brulebois wrote...
> >
> > > p-u NEW usually gets frozen a week before the point release. Having the
> > > package to review/test a week
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:43:08PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois wrote...
>
> > p-u NEW usually gets frozen a week before the point release. Having the
> > package to review/test a week before that (so 2 weeks before the point
> > release date) would be awesome. Depending
Cyril Brulebois wrote...
> p-u NEW usually gets frozen a week before the point release. Having the
> package to review/test a week before that (so 2 weeks before the point
> release date) would be awesome. Depending on external things, I could
> still make time if that's only a few days before
Heya,
Christoph Biedl (2019-03-17):
> Adam D. Barratt wrote...
>
> > Folks, what's the current status here?
>
> It's not forgotten, but now quite outdated. There are several more fixes
> that should go into the stretch version of busybox. I will take care of
> this in the next days.
>
>
Adam D. Barratt wrote...
> Folks, what's the current status here?
It's not forgotten, but now quite outdated. There are several more fixes
that should go into the stretch version of busybox. I will take care of
this in the next days.
Cyril, you previously mentioned the submission was too close
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 20:17 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Second attempt, updated debdiff attached.
>
> Changes:
>
> also address:
>
> + * Fix integer overflow in bzip2 decompresson.
> +Closes: #879732 [CVE-2017-15873]
> + * Filter out terminal escape sequence filtering in
Adam D. Barratt wrote...
> I'd be happy with this in general, but the udeb means we need an
> explicit d-i RM ack; CCing appropriately.
Okay, lesson learned: For such packages, don't proscrastinate the
request until close to the deadline that has passed now. There'll be
another point relase,
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 22:39 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> there are several non-dsa issues open for busybox. Now wearing the
> maintainer's hat (together with Chris Boot, cc'd), I'd like to fix
> them in an upcoming point release, for both jessie and stretch.
11 matches
Mail list logo
