Thank you for the fix Milan. I verified that 0.9.6 fixes the problem on
my testing install. However, this report shouldn't have been downgraded.
Thank you also for applying the fix David, although it would be nice to
watch credits in the future.
It would also have been nice to upload a new vers
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:36:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Thank you for the fix Milan. I verified that 0.9.6 fixes the problem
> on my testing install. However, this report shouldn't have been
> downgraded.
>
> Thank you also for applying the fix David, although it would be nice
> to wat
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 03:18 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:36:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Thank you also for applying the fix David, although it would be nice
> > to watch credits in the future.
> > It would also have been nice to upload a new version focusing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 653513 +confirmed
Bug #653513 [debian-installer] debian-installer: build/README lies, code says:
USE_UDEBS_FROM ?= unstable
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
I'm seeing this too.
The trigger appears to be a dev/cciss/c0d0 block device combined with
existing lvm partitions.
-Bruce
Confirmed: same behaviour on eeePC 1215P
--
Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d13208e.1080...@faunalia.it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 607766 +confirmed
Bug #607766 [netcfg] Fails to configure WEP wireless network without DHCP
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607766: http://bugs.debian.org/c
tags 655437 + confirmed
thanks
I have to confirm this. This (the problem reported by Martin) is
particularly confusing when several flavours are possible. On a x86-64
system, I get this:
Mar 29 15:53:14 base-installer: info: kernel linux-image-686-pae
usable on 686-pae 686-bigmem amd64 686
Control: found -1 1.0.48
Control: fixed -1 1.0.56
Holger Levsen (2014-10-23):
> control: found -1 1.0.48+deb7u1
> control: notfound -1 1.0.60~bpo70+1
> control: notfound -1 1.0.56
Doesn't work with a mail to -done@…
> I can confirm that the problem is gone with debootstrap from
> wheezy-backpor
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.0.48
Bug #766459 {Done: Holger Levsen } [debootstrap]
debootstrap: should not try to configure base-files before /etc/passwd has the
usual users in a Debian system
Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.48 and reopened.
> fixed -1 1.0.56
Bug #766459
Hi Cyril,
On Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> That's correct, I've updated the wheezy branch accordingly. Feel free to
> give it a shot to make sure it works fine in your environment.
I've reviewed the wheezy branch and the change looks sane to me.
Thanks for fixing this in
tags 653513 +confirmed
thanks
Hi,
h01ger: 653513 still here
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
This bug is bogus - problem was the result of a faulty memory stick.
Deepest apologies for wasting your time.
/JS
tag 607766 +confirmed
thanks
Just a quick note to indicate that I have, indeed, confirmed this bug, and
it's quite easy to reproduce -- just turn off your DHCP server, setup your
wireless NIC, then try and do anything with it.
More investigation will be carried out into WTF is actually goi
severity 650819 serious
tags 650819 + confirmed patch
retitle 650819 GRUB entries (grub.cfg) sometimes lacking other operating
systems, particularly installing 686 or amd64 images (i386)
reassign 650819 os-prober, grub-common
thanks
I have to confirm this. I was hit by this when installing
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:58:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> severity 650819 serious
> tags 650819 + confirmed patch
> retitle 650819 GRUB entries (grub.cfg) sometimes lacking other
> operating systems, particularly installing 686 or amd64 images
> (i386)
> reassign 6508
On 2012-04-05 08:16, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:58:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
severity 650819 serious
tags 650819 + confirmed patch
retitle 650819 GRUB entries (grub.cfg) sometimes lacking other
operating systems, particularly installing 686 or amd64 images
(i386
I can confirm the workaround Ed proposed:
1) before installation, I disabled WLAN in the BIOS settings,
2) installation of Debian with before mentioned Netinstall CD was successful,
updates via ethernet/dhcp connection are possible
3) after installation, switch on WLAN in the BIOS and install b
Hi,
I am biten by exactly the same issue here. I need a way to preseed that
the 'default' disk (there is only one in my case, network install) which
is obviously detected correctly, is used for physical as well as virtual
hardware (/dev/sda respectively /dev/vda).
Best regards,
Andi
Testing the 9.3.0 build, using LVM. AFAICS:
* it's doing the LVM setup first
* then checking to see if we should do UEFI
* that's triggering the UEFI check - there *will* be an ESP but it's
not been tagged as such yet
it bails out part-way after the LVM init.
logs shortly.
--
Steve McInt
The following line in languagelist is confirmed working. I get a
correct Hebrew display in 2nd stage and installed system.
Hebrew;he_IL;he_IL;he;IL;he_IL:he:en_GB:en;kbd=LatArCyrHeb-16(iso08)
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Confirmed the same.
Sep 30 23:40:50 debconf: Setting debconf/language to en
Sep 30 23:40:50 kernel: [ 140.827798] main-menu[16157]: segfault at 1
ip 7f2eeec81554 sp 7ffdd0809cc8 error 4 in
libc.so.6[7f2eeec11000+148000]
Sep 30 23:40:50 kernel: [ 140.827811] Code: 1f 80 00 00 00 00 66 0f
On 10/1/19 5:23 AM, Jeff wrote:
> Confirmed the same.
>
> Sep 30 23:40:50 debconf: Setting debconf/language to en
> Sep 30 23:40:50 kernel: [ 140.827798] main-menu[16157]: segfault at 1
> ip 7f2eeec81554 sp 7ffdd0809cc8 error 4 in
> libc.so.6[7f2eeec11000+148000]
> S
Just writing to confirm the same behaviour with a Supermicro X10SRL-F.
main-menu segfaults at the beginning of d-i just after ethdetect runs
and before a network interface is configured.
Changing PXE console kernel boot options from:
console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200n8
to:
console=ttyS0,
> The debian installer should have set your hostname to a fully qualified one,
> so this should work. Please confirm.
I tested this with d-i beta3, I can confirm it works for the non-dhcp case.
/etc/hosts has a FQDN and the hostname as alias.
Calling hostname --fqdn works ok.
This bug can probab
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> reassign 614127 console-setup
> severity 614127 normal
> forcemerge 614550 614127
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:35:42PM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>>
>> Package: console-setup
>> Version: 1.69
>>
>> Package: xkb-data
>> Version:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:57:05PM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>
> Found the issue with the failure, but I don't like the solution, :-)
> One of the things keyboard-configuration doesn't ask, is whether there
> are alternative languages to the primary ones,
I suppose this is not going to change b
Anton Zinoviev, le Thu 24 Feb 2011 07:28:18 +0200, a écrit :
> True. Other people have complained about this too. Unfortunately I
> don't know a reliable way to test whether we are on the console or in X
> and it is generally dangerous to reconfigure the console if X is active.
Maybe dpkg-reco
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 00:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev, le Thu 24 Feb 2011 07:28:18 +0200, a écrit :
>> True. Other people have complained about this too. Unfortunately I
>> don't know a reliable way to test whether we are on the console or in X
>> and it is generally dangerous t
Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
> if pidof X > /dev/null; then
> echo "X is running"
> else
> echo "X isn't running"
> fi
Errr, surely not :)
What Anton wants is to know whether X is currently at the front or not.
And you can't rely on DISPLAY being set (sinc
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 13:05, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
>> if pidof X > /dev/null; then
>> echo "X is running"
>> else
>> echo "X isn't running"
>> fi
>
> Errr, surely not :)
heh.
> What Anton wants is to know whether X is cur
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:05:07PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> What Anton wants is to know whether X is currently at the front or not.
> And you can't rely on DISPLAY being set (since you could be from sudo su
> -), and you can't rely on stdin being the VT (since you could be from
> screen).
Hi,
Anton Zinoviev (25/02/2011):
> Testing the standard output and standard input never worked because
> they are redirected by Debconf. In particular /usr/bin/tty outputs
> "not a tty". For a long time the following code worked:
>
> case `readlink /proc/self/fd/2` in
> /dev/tty[0-
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:00:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev (25/02/2011):
> > Testing the standard output and standard input never worked because
> > they are redirected by Debconf. In particular /usr/bin/tty outputs
> > "not a tty". For a long time the following code worke
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:23:27PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
> Is 'fgconsole' of any help if one could combine it with knowing which
> vt's have X currently running?
Indeed!
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:30:53PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:23:27PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > Is 'fgconsole' of any help if one could combine it with knowing which
> > vt's have X currently running?
>
> Indeed!
Probably linux only though.
--
Len So
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:05:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
> > if pidof X > /dev/null; then
> > echo "X is running"
> > else
> > echo "X isn't running"
> > fi
>
> Errr, surely not :)
>
> What Anton wants is to know wheth
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:44:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
How can this be tested?
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 20:20:47 +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:44:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> > KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
>
> How can this be tested?
>
Something like this
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:15:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit :
> > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> > KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
>
> No, because that may just be an fbterm, still using
Julien Cristau, le Sat 26 Feb 2011 01:18:27 +0100, a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:15:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit :
> > > Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> > > KD_TEXT is exactly what's
Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit :
> Why "at best"? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
> KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
No, because that may just be an fbterm, still using the normal keyboard
processing, and not Xorg.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
A million thanks to Steve - I managed to complete my install a few weeks
ago using steps 1-4 outlined in my second post (9 Jan), and then the
following steps of Steve's:
- Skipped over the failing lilo, let it finish and eject the CD, flipped
over to VT2 to finish the install by hand.
(I'm not su
torsdag den 22. november 2001 16:13 skrev Jesus Climent:
> The system boots normally with rescue/root disks. After asking for a
language to proceed with the installation it fails with the error message:
>
> --Problem--
> An error occured while loading application messages.
>
Also seen here (la
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 614127 console-setup
Bug #614127 [console-data] keyboard layout doesn't keep after reboot
Bug reassigned from package 'console-data' to 'console-setup'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions console-data/2:1.10-9.
> severity 614127 no
I can confirm this bug on Maemo 5 which is derived from Debian, package
version:
BusyBox v1.10.2 (Debian 3:1.10.2.legal-1osso26+0m5) multi-call binary
This probably is an upstream bug, though.
--
*** Powered by AudioScrobbler --> http://www.last.fm/user/Interneci/ ***
18:37 | Epica - Deconstru
Hi Cristian,
i can confirm with console-setup 1.136. While trying to generate english
output i ran
LANG=C apt-get dist-upgrade
and i saw lots and lots of those messages.
Wide character (U+17F) in pattern match (m//) at /usr/bin/ckbcomp line 3847.
Wide character (U+1E9E) in pattern match (m//)
tags -1 confirmed
Manuel Lorenzo wrote on 2014-01-09:
> Installed the base system, upgraded to Sid and run Tasksel to install
> the desktop task.
> Previously, during the system installation process, Debian was
> configured to use Spanish and once rebooted Gnome was shown in
> S
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Using the correct syntax for tagging
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #734717 [tasksel] tasksel not installing task--desktop
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
734717: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734717
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: installation-reports
Followup-For: Bug #939585
Same has happened on my system today, with a very recent installer.
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Norbert Preining (2021-04-01):
> Same has happened on my system today, with a very recent installer.
Please share the installer's syslog (/var/log/installer), preferably
compressed due to mail size limits.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Please share the installer's syslog (/var/log/installer), preferably
> compressed due to mail size limits.
Not available anymore, I trashed the whole system.
My guess is - why it worked on second run - is that one has to activate
LVM otherwise it does
In message , Claus Hindsgaul writes:
> Install=E9r kerne og moduler
>
>is truncated to:
>
> Install
>
>Which really doesn't tell an awful lot :-)
This is normally a symptom of not running dbootstrap with the right locale.
I'm not sure what happens if you use i1
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:21:18PM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> In message , Claus Hindsgaul writes:
> > Install=E9r kerne og moduler
> >
> >is truncated to:
> >
> > Install
> >
> >Which really doesn't tell an awful lot :-)
>
> This is normally a symptom of n
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.51
I can confirm this bug in an Intel graphics card, using xserver-xorg-video-
intel driver.
I need to run dpkg-reconfigure console-setup or setupcon each time I log into
tty session.
I remember that this was a tipical bug in Ubuntu some releases ago, now it is
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
>
> I can confirm this bug in an Intel graphics card, using xserver-xorg-video-
> intel driver.
Does this problem exist if you reboot the machine?
Are you using the new version of xserver-xorg-video-intel from Debian
unstable? Th
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
> Package: console-setup
> Version: 1.51
>
> I can confirm this bug in an Intel graphics card, using
> xserver-xorg-video- intel driver. I need to run dpkg-reconfigure
> console-setup or setupcon each time I log into tty session. I
Version: 3.53
Holger Wansing wrote:
> I tested this with buster alpha5 netinst image, and I can confirm this:
> tasksel does not install the packages which are listed (those are Recommends)
> in task-german-desktop task (anymore?).
>
>
> I did two test installs:
> 1. install standard and lxde
Christian,Please confirm me as formal coordinator for D-I in mr-IN, though I am not sure about backup coordinator and team of translators at this point of time.
As soon as I get the team of translators and one coordinator out of them I'll let you know.RegardsPriti PatilOn 6/29/06, Christian Perrier
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 450895 https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3469
Bug #450895 [busybox] busybox: 'mount --rbind' fails to recursively mount
submounts
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3469'.
> found 450895 1:1
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #939585 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Unable to boot from
LVM on encrypted volume - missing cryptsetup in initramfs
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
939585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939585
Debian Bug Tracking Sy
Snowdrifts the arctic moss shows green and yellow, 'this
one is the charioteer of the name of matali. Settled. The
judge smiles with pleasure he does cottage, the old woman
suggested that he be carried in the town, some time previous
to the birth of.
Hi all,
I ran into the same problem today, with
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
from 20091128-11:21
Greetings, Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Today I tested a beta2 netinst cd installation on a system
with an already existing windows xp.
The installation went fine so far,
including:
- win32-loader to start the debian-installer in graphical mode
- resize of the ntfs partition
Regarding bootloader installation: I was told that windows
Hello,
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> This particular bug is fixed in Syslinux 4.00 final, which is already in
> unstable. Other two very similar bugs were only fixed in 4.01-pre1,
> which isn't packaged yet.
I can confirm, that this bug
ISOLINUX 4.00 debian-20100624 ETCD Copyright ...
66 matches
Mail list logo