On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:49:40PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mercredi 18 juin 2008 à 09:52 +0300, Eric Pozharski a écrit :
> > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > OTOH, aren't most of these
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 18 juin 2008 à 09:52 +0300, Eric Pozharski a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > OTOH, aren't most of these choosing lilo over grub only doing so by
> > > habit ?
> >
> > OTOH
Le mercredi 18 juin 2008 à 09:52 +0300, Eric Pozharski a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > OTOH, aren't most of these choosing lilo over grub only doing so by
> > habit ?
>
> OTOH, aren't most of theses choosing emacs over vim only doing so by
> habit?
The
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
*SKIP*
> OTOH, aren't most of these choosing lilo over grub only doing so by
> habit ?
OTOH, aren't most of theses choosing emacs over vim only doing so by
habit?
--
Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination
--
To U
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > We still very regularly get installation reports where people use lilo
> > rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant user base. I
> > would say that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Am Di den 17. Jun 2008 um 12:14 schrieb Peter Palfrader:
> > >> AFAIK grub (at least the default "legacy" version) also still has
> > >> problems with / on XFS. That's the one other case where D-I
> > >> automatically falls back to lilo.
>
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 17, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frans Pop wrote:
> >> AFAIK grub (at least the default "legacy" version) also still has
> >> problems with / on XFS. That's the one other case where D-I
> >> automatically falls back to lilo.
> > I
On Jun 17, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>> AFAIK grub (at least the default "legacy" version) also still has
>> problems with / on XFS. That's the one other case where D-I
>> automatically falls back to lilo.
> I think you mean /boot on XFS. Having / as XFS seems to wo
Frans Pop wrote:
AFAIK grub (at least the default "legacy" version) also still has problems
with / on XFS. That's the one other case where D-I automatically falls
back to lilo.
I think you mean /boot on XFS. Having / as XFS seems to work fine for me...
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
(Dropping d-release again.)
On Monday 16 June 2008, peter green wrote:
> >> I am wondering if it is a good idea to remove lilo entirely. At the
> >> moment, lilo has been pulled from testing, and the code is in a
> >> shape
>
> Can either version of grub handle all the cases that lilo can?
D-I cu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/16/08 04:19, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>> We still very regularly get installation reports where people use lilo
>> rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant user base. I
(Dropping d-release for this part of the discussion.)
On Monday 16 June 2008, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > We still very regularly get installation reports where people use
> > lilo rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> We still very regularly get installation reports where people use lilo
> rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant user base. I
> would say that the activity on the bug report shows the same.
OTOH, aren't most of the
I am wondering if it is a good idea to remove lilo entirely. At the
moment, lilo has been pulled from testing, and the code is in a shape
Can either version of grub handle all the cases that lilo can? for
example can either of them handle the situation where root is on lvm and
there is no
William Pitcock wrote:
> I am wondering if it is a good idea to remove lilo entirely. At the
> moment, lilo has been pulled from testing, and the code is in a shape
That's just great. That means that whoever did this just broke an option
that's been available in Debian Installer since forever: to
15 matches
Mail list logo
