Re: Consolidating armhf installer flavours

2013-09-24 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 12:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Ian, > > [ disclaimer: I don't know anything about arm*… ] > > Ian Campbell (2013-09-24): > > Perhaps it would be sensible to split this patch up and add the new > > flavour now, so folks can test it, and remove the other flavours a

Re: Consolidating armhf installer flavours

2013-09-24 Thread Nigel Sollars
HI all, Perhaps a bit off topic, Ive gotten Wheezy up and running on Panda ES - 4460, Ive seen in /lib/modules you have a 3.11 rc6 candidate. my questions are: 1. hows the status of this one? 2. id like to know the version of u-boot used to build it 3. the LOADADDR value used for the uImag

Re: Consolidating armhf installer flavours

2013-09-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Ian, [ disclaimer: I don't know anything about arm*… ] Ian Campbell (2013-09-24): > Perhaps it would be sensible to split this patch up and add the new > flavour now, so folks can test it, and remove the other flavours a bit > later on. looks OK to me. > My only concern would be the short t

Re: Consolidating armhf installer flavours

2013-09-24 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 17:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > With the current trunk/experimental 3.11 kernel the separate omap5, mx5 > and vexpress flavours have been removed in favour of the armmp flavour > which supports all of those. > > So I think we need to switch the installer over too. Since th

Consolidating armhf installer flavours

2013-09-21 Thread Ian Campbell
With the current trunk/experimental 3.11 kernel the separate omap5, mx5 and vexpress flavours have been removed in favour of the armmp flavour which supports all of those. So I think we need to switch the installer over too. Since the 3.10 kernel already has the armmp flavour I don't think we even