On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:39:29PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 14:09 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2009-09-10 01:22]:
Why? The /dev/ram* devices are not needed anymore for the early boot
with 2.6 kernels, unless there is
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Is installation from floppies still supported? If so, can they be
converted to using initramfs?
Actually, I don't see how this can work today since ext2 is a module...
Has anyone tested that these work in lenny?
There are no floppy
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Is installation from floppies still supported? If so, can they be
converted to using initramfs?
Actually, I don't see how this can work today since ext2 is a module...
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
So why can't all of the the lenny/squeeze installations be done with
the kernel from etch or even sarge? This would seem to be completely
within the jurisdiction of the installer team. Am I missing
something?
1) Because it still needs to be
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-09-16 18:07]:
We also have:
./config/armel/ads.cfg:11:INITRD_FS = ext2
No idea about this, although I think I saw a reply from Martin about it
(specifically enabled in the armel config IIRC).
We don't have a kernel for ADS in Debian, we merely provide a
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
So why can't all of the the lenny/squeeze installations be done with
the kernel from etch or even sarge? This would seem to be completely
within the jurisdiction of the
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:24:00PM -0400, Lee Winter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Is installation from floppies still supported? If so, can they be
converted to using initramfs?
(No need to CC me on replies.)
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
Nah. The whole point is to support legacy systems that are capable of
_running_ the newest software, but whose peripheral suite is not
adequte to _bootstrap_ the larger images. is it your belief that the
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:24:00PM -0400, Lee Winter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Is installation from floppies
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
(No need to CC me on replies.)
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
Nah. The whole point is to support legacy systems that are capable of
_running_ the newest software, but whose peripheral suite is not
adequte
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 14:09 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2009-09-10 01:22]:
Why? The /dev/ram* devices are not needed anymore for the early boot
with 2.6 kernels, unless there is something fundamental I am missing
this driver should become
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2009-09-10 01:22]:
Why? The /dev/ram* devices are not needed anymore for the early boot
with 2.6 kernels, unless there is something fundamental I am missing
this driver should become modular.
Apparently it used to be needed by debian-installer, but
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 19:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Why? The /dev/ram* devices are not needed anymore for the early boot
with 2.6 kernels, unless there is something fundamental I am missing
this driver should become modular.
Apparently it used to be needed by
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Why? The /dev/ram* devices are not needed anymore for the early boot
with 2.6 kernels, unless there is something fundamental I am missing
this driver should become modular.
Apparently it used to be needed by debian-installer, but that doesn't
seem to be the case any more.
14 matches
Mail list logo
