On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 11:46:48AM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
tis 2003-03-25 klockan 20.46 skrev Branden Robinson:
I notice that your discover-data package on
hackers.progeny.com/~branden/discover2 also contain the *.lst files, is
that for backwards compatability and are actually not
tis 2003-03-25 klockan 20.46 skrev Branden Robinson:
I notice that your discover-data package on
hackers.progeny.com/~branden/discover2 also contain the *.lst files, is
that for backwards compatability and are actually not used?
Yes, the .lst files are there for backwards compatibility so
Glenn McGrath asked why I didn't just prep and upload the Discover 2.x
packages to unstable. The answers are in the following bug log:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179048
I will be uploading the Discover 2.x debs to experimental until the
debian-installer team doesn't need
tis 2003-03-25 klockan 19.17 skrev Branden Robinson:
Glenn McGrath asked why I didn't just prep and upload the Discover 2.x
packages to unstable. The answers are in the following bug log:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179048
I will be uploading the Discover 2.x debs to
A pre-release (source code only) of Discover 1.5-2 is available:
http://hackers.progeny.com/~branden/discover-1.5-2pre.tar.gz
The reason this isn't a package release is because the GNU autotools
have changed sufficiently in unstable to cause problems.
If someone from the debian-installer team
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:03:19 -0500
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A pre-release (source code only) of Discover 1.5-2 is available:
Why version 1.5, i see 2.0.1 is the latest version ?
Glenn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
6 matches
Mail list logo