Bug#908789: Bug never got a followup

2020-03-29 Thread Joseph Carter
This bug never got a followup, but I can name three circumstances I know of under which it still happens. 1. Almost guaranteed to not be the problem, but it should be documented somewhere: If you use an Atom-based "nettop" where the external display is the only one used, it might

Bug#815916: Followup

2016-10-24 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 24.10.2016 00:41, Philipp Kern wrote: [...] >> >> [1] >> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/p/partman-base/partman-base_187ubuntu2/changelog >> >> [2] >> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_110ubuntu4/changelog > >> > I

Bug#815916: Followup

2016-10-23 Thread Philipp Kern
On 08/31/2016 01:21 PM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > the patches have been incorporated in Ubuntu's d-i since their 16.04 > release ([1],[2]) and I would hope that thereby they have gotten > sufficient test coverage in the meantime. I haven't heard of breakages > for other architectures and they hav

Bug#815916: Followup

2016-08-31 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
Dear Maintainer(s), the patches have been incorporated in Ubuntu's d-i since their 16.04 release ([1],[2]) and I would hope that thereby they have gotten sufficient test coverage in the meantime. I haven't heard of breakages for other architectures and they have positively fixed the issues for s39

Bug#796941: followup

2015-08-26 Thread NeatNerdPrime
Hello KiBi, you were right, it was due to the missing apt-setup/use_mirror. I think we can close this particular braindropping-bug. On 26-08-15 13:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > NeatNerdPrime (2015-08-26): >> Followup on this issue: >> >> The sources.l

Bug#796941: followup

2015-08-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, NeatNerdPrime (2015-08-26): > Followup on this issue: > > The sources.list file in /target/etc/apt appear to be different when > performing installation preseeded or manual. > It appears that the sources.list file generated with the preseed method > has forgotten to add t

Bug#796941: followup

2015-08-26 Thread NeatNerdPrime
Followup on this issue: The sources.list file in /target/etc/apt appear to be different when performing installation preseeded or manual. It appears that the sources.list file generated with the preseed method has forgotten to add the mirror settings and the updates section of apt. It is

Re: preseeding choice of init system? - followup info

2014-10-20 Thread Brian Potkin
On Fri 17 Oct 2014 at 13:59:21 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Miles Fidelman (2014-10-17): > > > > Cool. But will it get applied (just read the log on #668001)? Sigh > > You already have a solution, provided in minutes after you asked. > > Feel free to take your sighing elsewhere, thanks

Re: preseeding choice of init system? - followup info

2014-10-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Miles Fidelman (2014-10-17): > Kenshi Muto wrote: > >At 16 Oct 14 19:36:54 GMT, > >Miles Fidelman wrote: > >(snip) > >>base-installer/includes > >>and/or > >>base-installer/excludes > >> > >>So, in theory, it looks like there IS a way to preseed things during the > >>early install process - but...

Re: preseeding choice of init system? - followup info

2014-10-17 Thread Miles Fidelman
Kenshi Muto wrote: At 16 Oct 14 19:36:54 GMT, Miles Fidelman wrote: (snip) base-installer/includes and/or base-installer/excludes So, in theory, it looks like there IS a way to preseed things during the early install process - but - bug #668001 in debootstrap (open since 2012) seems to get

Re: preseeding choice of init system? - followup info

2014-10-16 Thread Kenshi Muto
At 16 Oct 14 19:36:54 GMT, Miles Fidelman wrote: (snip) > base-installer/includes > and/or > base-installer/excludes > > So, in theory, it looks like there IS a way to preseed things during the > early install process - but > > - bug #668001 in debootstrap (open since 2012) seems to get in t

Re: preseeding choice of init system? - followup info

2014-10-16 Thread Miles Fidelman
Since I asked the question, I figure I should follow up with what I found out Cyril Brulebois wrote: Miles Fidelman (2014-10-16): 1. Where in the installer code does the init system get installed into the target build? As far as I can tell, from somewhat out-of-date documentation (http:/

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#728936: installation-reports: still present on PowerPC netinst as of 2013/11/24 Followup-For: Bug #728936 Package: installation-reports

2013-12-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 728936 important Bug #728936 [installation-reports] Debian testing installer does not dectect USB keyboard. Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > This bug is still present after several weeks in Unknown command or malformed argumen

Bug#728936: installation-reports: still present on PowerPC netinst as of 2013/11/24 Followup-For: Bug #728936 Package: installation-reports

2013-11-25 Thread Rick Thomas
Dear Maintainer, when it got to the "chose language" screen, there was no response to the keyboard or the mouse. See below for details... -- Package-specific info: Boot method: CD Image version: /cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd Date: 2013/11/25 approximately 01:00 UTC Ma

Bug#683128: Followup-For: Bug #511896

2012-07-28 Thread Matt Ford
Package: debian-installer Followup-For: Bug #511896 Dear Maintainer, I see a similar issue when trying to re-install over an all ready existing Debian Wheezy install. In my case a full disk encrypted LVM was all ready present. From a USB net-install the partitioning step hangs at 39%. The

Bug#664128: followup from phcoder

2012-03-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
phcoder gave me the following information on IRC about this transition: 15:13 < phcoder> dkg: install method can be changed to whatever yaboot currently uses for the ease of transition if I get enough info about what it does 15:13 < phcoder> And HFS+ works as well Regards, --dkg -

Bug#585901: Followup

2010-07-29 Thread Lenard Lindstrom
>> Initial failure to detect ethernet controllers This was probably due to a dead CMOS battery and conflict between the onboard ethernet controller and installed cards. There has been no boot problems since the battery was replaced and all PCI cards were removed. Firmware installation: (http

Bug#491813: followup - LennyBeta2 boots ok

2008-07-21 Thread Vincent . McIntyre
I tried lenny beta 2, that booted successfully. http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz md5: 6d3bb654070a821de94774f89dd5d11d http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/lenny_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-LennyBeta2-i386-netinst.iso md5: 9dab64b

Re: Bug#480755: IRC followup

2008-06-18 Thread Robert Millan
reassign 480755 tasksel thanks Tasksel maintainers: I think libgl1-mesa-dri is very needed in the desktop task; it is a common problem that X users don't get DRI support by default, and run into issues that are not trivial to track down. See the bug log for more details. On Wed, May 14, 2008 at

Processed: Re: Bug#480755: IRC followup

2008-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 480755 tasksel Bug#480755: compiz should bring libgl1-mesa-dri|nvidia|fglrx|... whatever needed to get 3D Bug reassigned from package `compiz' to `tasksel'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#449292: followup

2008-01-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 07 January 2008, Joey Hess wrote: > No, it does not make sense to try to modprobe rtc-dev and only make the > symlink if the modprobe succeeds. rtc-dev is built into the kernel on > the nslu2 and some other hardware. It still seems to me that just modprobing them both by default and prin

Bug#449292: followup

2008-01-07 Thread Joey Hess
The version of udev that supports the rtc symlink is 116. No, it does not make sense to try to modprobe rtc-dev and only make the symlink if the modprobe succeeds. rtc-dev is built into the kernel on the nslu2 and some other hardware. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#281839: Followup on 281839

2004-12-16 Thread Kyle T. Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I didn't see this addressed anywhere else in the current bugs list so I figured I'd follow up with this existing bug. The failure of the nvidia sata to detect attached drives seems to be related to a timeout issue. Rather than describe it here I'll pr

Bug#244775: marked as done ([i386] [beta3] [netinst] VIA Rhine NIC support missing (no followup by submitter))

2004-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:04:02 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing this report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#264370: followup on this report

2004-10-14 Thread Kenshi Muto
Hi, At Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:04:04 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Can you verify that ssh problems are fixed in the current debian-installer? > > Also, do you still see the crash with baseconfig-udeb? What kind of > crash is it exactly? I tried on VMware (linux DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium). When prebasecon

Bug#264370: followup on this report

2004-10-14 Thread Joey Hess
Can you verify that ssh problems are fixed in the current debian-installer? Also, do you still see the crash with baseconfig-udeb? What kind of crash is it exactly? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#250915: Followup on Bug#250915: about your Debian installation report

2004-10-14 Thread Jason Dobbs
Whoops, I just re-read the entire correspondence of the bug report, and Branden does say something more about testing his changes. He talks of preparing a patch for me to try out by building from the XFree86 Subversion source tree. I could give it a try, if he's ready with the patch before mid-D

Bug#250915: Followup on Bug#250915: about your Debian installation report

2004-10-14 Thread Jason Dobbs
Joey Hess requested a re-test of the problem install. Unfortunately, I don't have time to do a re-install, especially since there's nothing in the xserver-xfree86 changelogs to suggest the problem is fixed. I did have some correspondence with Branden Robinson. He did mention plans to backport

Re: Bug#239111: Followup

2004-08-30 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:04:30AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > I was reinstalling my laptop yesterday and ran into this problem. I > found that replacing all the xfs_freeze stuff with a single call of > 'sync;sync;sync' would not cause the deadlock. > > Perhaps it is sufficient to freeze, then unf

Followup

2004-08-25 Thread Joshua Kwan
I was reinstalling my laptop yesterday and ran into this problem. I found that replacing all the xfs_freeze stuff with a single call of 'sync;sync;sync' would not cause the deadlock. Perhaps it is sufficient to freeze, then unfreeze the filesystem? -- Joshua Kwan signature.asc Description: Dig

Bug#259942: d-i dated 2004 07 13 failled to boot on a sparc sunblade 100 (followup)

2004-08-02 Thread Joel Soete
Hello *, today I download latest iso: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/20040801/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso always failled as previously :( then http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040801/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso also failled as previously too :( OTC

Bug#250843: followup

2004-07-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
conflicts on the udebs while building a new cd image and I'm too lazy to redownload an archived one. I will check it again once the udebs are fixed (marked on paper and stuck to the cd case). Thanks for the followup. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#250843: followup

2004-07-14 Thread Joey Hess
Did you ever get anywhere on this tail problem? Can you still reproduce it? One possibility is something is creating a new /var/log/messages. busybox tail will not follow to new files. I saw this once when a broken anna re-installed the rootskel udeb, which includes an empty /var/log/messages, but

debian-installer usage on sarge [followup]

2002-11-22 Thread Christian Ruediger Bahls
.. stupid me i am not subscribed to debian-boot so if you would be so kind, as to CC the mail to me as well .. > best regards > christian bahls > maths student > university of rostock > germany > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: debian-installer patch followup #2

2002-08-30 Thread Colin Walters
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 11:02, Wartan Hachaturow wrote: > Some time ago I've synced autopartkit with 1.6. It's pretty easy > to do this with 1.4, since API is different mostly in function names ;) > I've also synced partkit, but there has been some changes ;) since > then. I could do a merge and co

Re: debian-installer patch followup #2

2002-08-28 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Martin Sj?gren wrote: > Hmm. partkit seems to be using parted 1.4. The version in unstable is > 1.6. Sucks to be me I suppose, the testing version is still 1.4, but who > knows when 1.6 will move to testing. The API is very different, which I > encountere

Re: debian-installer patch followup #2

2002-08-28 Thread Martin Sjögren
ons 2002-08-28 klockan 04.13 skrev Michael Cardenas: > Here's my final patch. This one fixes the two fixme's in partkit.c, > one for getting a list of devices, the other for getting a default. I > just use the first device returned as the default. Hmm. partkit seems to be using parted 1.4. The v

debian-installer patch followup #2

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Cardenas
Here's my final patch. This one fixes the two fixme's in partkit.c, one for getting a list of devices, the other for getting a default. I just use the first device returned as the default. michael -- michael cardenas | lead software engineer | lindows.com | hyperpoem.net "When you understand

Re: debian-installer patch followup: tools/partkit/partkit.c

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Cardenas
Martin Sjögren wrote: >>+ ptr = partkit_get_devices(dev); >> >> client->command (client, "subst", "partkit/select_device", "choices", >> ptr, NULL); >>+ free(ptr); >>+ >> /*FIXME: how to get a default device? */ >> client->command (client, "s

Re: debian-installer patch followup: tools/partkit/partkit.c

2002-08-27 Thread Martin Sjögren
tis 2002-08-27 klockan 19.09 skrev Michael Cardenas: > Here's a cleaner version of this patch. Dang. I should read all my mail before starting to reply to some of it :-) > +char *partkit_get_devices(PedDevice *dev) [snip] This fixes some of my comments in the other mail. > + ptr = partki

debian-installer patch followup: tools/partkit/partkit.c

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Cardenas
Here's a cleaner version of this patch. Also, I tested it on another machine (not my laptop) and it works fine. Is libparted not completely reliable? -- michael cardenas | lead software engineer | lindows.com | hyperpoem.net "Time itself is being. All being is time" - Dogen --- partkit.c.or

Followup: bootfloppies on powerpc prep

2002-04-30 Thread Rubin
Hi all, Thanks to Kaz Aoshima's iso image, I've been able to succesfully boot my Bull Estrella Series 300 (aka Motorola Powerstack 4000 II)! As soon as I'm up to speed and have read up some debian docs, I want to work on the current bootfloppies in testing (for powerpc prep, that is). Thanks f

Followup: bootfloppies for powerpc prep (I forgot the link ;-)

2002-04-30 Thread Rubin
Ah yes well. I forgot the link to Kaz's ppc prep linux page for those that don't know: http://ppc.linux.or.jp/~aoshimak Happy Hacking, Rubin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Followup to install problem (freezing at inode write)

2001-04-27 Thread Lee Monamy
Just an FYI (sorry to the person who responded, I lost your message). It appears that the second DIMM slot on the motherboard is faulty. Why this would cause the machine to freeze at the *exact* same point is beyond me, but now that the DIMM that was in it has gone, debian is installing perfec