Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-09-09 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006, Dave Beckett wrote: > I've done this. libcairo 1.2.4-2 is now uploaded to experimental. Works great! Thanks, I've uploaded a snapshot of ongoing Gtk 2.10 work to experimental. One thing though: I think it would be safest to bump the libcairo-directfb2 shlibs as, curren

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-09-03 Thread Dave Beckett
Loïc Minier wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006, Dave Beckett wrote: >>I'm ok with adding it to the default cairo+directfb >> build; i.e. I will add the --enable-pdf and --enable-ps to the builds. > > Great! I've done this. libcairo 1.2.4-2 is now uploaded to experimental. Dave --

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-09-03 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006, Dave Beckett wrote: >I'm ok with adding it to the default cairo+directfb > build; i.e. I will add the --enable-pdf and --enable-ps to the builds. Great! > > That's a bit risky, but we can try; I guess we will immediately see > > whether some symbols are mi

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-09-03 Thread Dave Beckett
Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 02, 2006, Dave Beckett wrote: >> I already said that I won't change/bloat the cairo+directfb udebs >> that are for the installer. They don't need PDF and PS support >> and do need lib/dev debs that match the udeb so that other udebs >> can be built

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-09-03 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Sat, Sep 02, 2006, Dave Beckett wrote: > I already said that I won't change/bloat the cairo+directfb udebs > that are for the installer. They don't need PDF and PS support > and do need lib/dev debs that match the udeb so that other udebs > can be built against them, such as the gt

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-09-03 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Dave Beckett wrote: No, do not do this. I already said that I won't change/bloat the cairo+directfb udebs that are for the installer. They don't need PDF and PS support and do need lib/dev debs that match the udeb so that other udebs can be built against them, such as the gtk+directfb udeb.

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-09-03 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Loïc Minier wrote: Hi, On Thu, Aug 31, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: i did some testing today compiling gtk+ from CVS HEAD against libcairo-directfb2 (1.2.4-1) and libdirectfb-0.9-25 (0.9.25.1-3) and it turns out that - a fresher DirectFB than the latest release (0.9.25.1); I hop

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-09-02 Thread Dave Beckett
Loïc Minier wrote: ... >>> - to rebuild the DirectFB flavor of Cairo with --enable-pdf and >>> --enable-ps as requested in Debian #383297 >> still awaiting the patch to be applied, currently GTK+ from HEAD does >> not compile against DFB flavour of cairo from debian packages because of >> lack

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-09-02 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Thu, Aug 31, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > i did some testing today compiling gtk+ from CVS HEAD against > libcairo-directfb2 (1.2.4-1) and libdirectfb-0.9-25 (0.9.25.1-3) and it > turns out that > > - a fresher DirectFB than the latest release (0.9.25.1); I hope the > > Dir

Re: Gtk 2.10 (DirectFB) progress report - update

2006-08-31 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Hi i did some testing today compiling gtk+ from CVS HEAD against libcairo-directfb2 (1.2.4-1) and libdirectfb-0.9-25 (0.9.25.1-3) and it turns out that - a fresher DirectFB than the latest release (0.9.25.1); I hope the DirectFB maintainer has the time to prepare a snapshot for experi