Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2020 04:58:02 +0200
with message-id <20200821045802.07acb7c9ded347064600d...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 5
has caused the Debian Bug report #805342,
regarding Stretch Alpha 4 Installation Report (
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB Stick
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/stretch_di_alpha4/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-stretch-DI-alpha4-amd64-DVD-1.iso
Date: 11/16/2015
Machine: Dell XPS 13 (late 2015) with WiFi/Bluetooth card change from
stock to an Intel 7265.
Sure did...
See bug #636269.
Enjoy!
Rick
On Aug 13, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:15, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
Install went without a hitch until it came time to reboot into the
newly
installed system.
Did you try to install a more
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:15, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
Install went without a hitch until it came time to reboot into the newly
installed system.
Did you try to install a more recent image? If don't, could you give
it a new try and send us the syslog (gzipped) thus we can guess
In contrast to Jeroen's report that Wheezy installation went fine on
G3 Mac...
I just tried the sid_d-i testing daily businesscard. (details of
exactly which iso are available on request)
Install went without a hitch until it came time to reboot into the
newly installed system.
The
On Aug 1, 2011, at 4:15 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
In contrast to Jeroen's report that Wheezy installation went fine
on G3 Mac...
I just tried the sid_d-i testing daily businesscard. (details of
exactly which iso are available on request)
Install went without a hitch until it came time
OK,
I downloaded
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-testing-powerpc-businesscard.iso
Daily build #5 for powerpc, using installer build from sid
These images will install the testing version of Debian, currently
Wheezy.
...
This
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 02:18:29AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
After booting the CD, there were a lot of messages that scrolled by
too fast to get details, but all of them seemed to have something to
do with missing some UTF8 localization stuff.
This is the cause of everything else. I *think*
Hi David, Hi Colin,
On Jul 29, 2011, at 12:35 PM, David Ricar wrote:
On 07/29/2011 08:18 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
After booting the CD, there were a lot of messages that scrolled by
too
fast to get details, but all of them seemed to have something to do
with
missing some UTF8
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 20:59, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
Colin, do you have any idea when your fix will be available for testing?
Can you let me know when it happens?
It is just a matter of waiting a cuple of days. If it doesn't work we
can check the build log and see if it has
OK.
I'll try again on Monday or Tuesday (busy weekend coming up).
Rick
On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 20:59, Rick Thomas rbtho...@pobox.com wrote:
Colin, do you have any idea when your fix will be available for
testing?
Can you let me know
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:19 +
with message-id e1otbnf-0005ny...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line Closing old installation report #396469
has caused the Debian Bug report #396469,
regarding Installation report: failed install on Toshiba Satellite
to be marked as done
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:23 +
with message-id e1otbnj-0005tx...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line Closing old installation report #405397
has caused the Debian Bug report #405397,
regarding installation-report: Failed wireless install on Sony Vaio
to be marked as done
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:31 +
with message-id e1otbnr-0005kt...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line Closing old installation report #494978
has caused the Debian Bug report #494978,
regarding installation-report: failed to install Debian 4.0r4a powerpc on an
IBM 52a using VIOS
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:46 +
with message-id e1otbn8-0004g4...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line Closing old installation report #280598
has caused the Debian Bug report #280598,
regarding installation-report (failed)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:57 +
with message-id e1otbnj-0004ea...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line Closing old installation report #306786
has caused the Debian Bug report #306786,
regarding Debian-Installer installation report: failed on Dell PowerEdge 2850
with Perc 4e/Di
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:09 +
with message-id e1otbnv-00053a...@ravel.debian.org
and subject line Closing old installation report #349250
has caused the Debian Bug report #349250,
regarding installation-report: failed to detect volume device
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:14:18 +0200
with message-id bb145bd20910080514k2b78f610se49d5988407e3...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#352750: Installation report (failed w/ daily)
has caused the Debian Bug report #352750,
regarding Installation report (failed w/ daily
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.35
Severity: normal
failed to install Debian 4.0r4a powerpc on an IBM 52a using VIOS 1.5 with
virtual optical drive
- created an LPAR
- connected to the internal virtual lan with access to the world
- 32GB logical volume from VIOS served via
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:23:20 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#385188: installation-report: Failed to determine the
codename for the release (sparc, daily 20060828)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Toshikazu Aiyama, Ph.D. wrote:
3. Expert install fails producing the following message:
[!!] Configure the network
Network autoconfiguration failed
Your network is probably not using the DHCP protocol. Alternatively, the DHCP
server may be slow or some network hardware is not working
Package: installation-reports
Version: ??? report templates are not produced
Severity: ???
I used testing netinst image obtained from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/current/i386/iso-cd/
The image is dated Jan 1, 2007
Machine: Sony Vaio Note PCG-V505S/PB
Partitions:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 23:23, Bill McNeill wrote:
I'm stuck. Can't get Debian to work on this machine. I did some
Googling and determined that others have hit this error, but there
appears to be no clear workaround.
Could it be that you were using the installer for Sarge? If so, could
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 15:45, Bill McNeill wrote:
The machine is hard hung, so I'm not in a debug shell and I can't page
up to see what came before the segment fault. Unfortunately, I can't
see what was loading before the fault: the very top of the screen is
filled up with the register
Here's the entire screen:cc8394ed*pde = 012ef067
*pte = Oops:
CPU: 0EIP: 001:[cc8394ed] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010046eax: ebx: cc825b50 ecx: edx: 0cfc
esi: 00ff edi: cbfe3400 ebp: esp: cb19e84
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018Process modprobe (pid: 43,
The machine is hard hung, so I'm not in a debug shell and I can't page up to see what came before the segment fault. Unfortunately, I can't see what was loading before the fault: the very top of the screen is filled up with the register dump and whatnot.
I don't know how to figure out what was
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CDImage version: www.debian.org in October 2006
Date: 2:00 p.m. October 31, 2006
Machine: Toshiba SatelliteProcessor: Intel Celeron 2.80 GHz
Memory: ???Partitions: Can't run df. I took the defaults the install program gave me: one for files plus
a swap
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 23:23, Bill McNeill wrote:
Machine: Toshiba Satellite
Processor: Intel Celeron 2.80 GHz
Strange, I have a quite similar machine which I reinstalled very recently
and which works perfectly (Toshiba Satellite A40, Mobile Pentium 4, 2.8
GHz).
Comments/Problems:
I
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.18
Severity: important
Boot method: CD, via serial console using cu(1)
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20060827/sparc/iso-cd/debian-testing-sparc-businesscard.iso
, built on 20060828
Date: 2006-08-29, 18:00
Machine:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: debian.org, test version i386 of 08 Nov 2004
Date: 09 nov 2004
Team Debian,
Attempts to install i386/20041108/sarge-i386-netinst on a new Dell Dimension
8400 3.0GHz P4 with 4GB RAM and two SATA drives failed with a no partitionable
media
1Aw2jP-0003UC-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:21:59 -0300
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:21:59 -0300
From: Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation Report (Failed horribly)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
PROTECTED]
To: Stephen T. Bellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#244451: Installation Report; Failed
Stephen T. Bellis wrote:
It doesn't matter what I do I can't get this machine to mount ANY cd to
preform the install.
I've tried several d-i
Stephen T. Bellis wrote:
I figured out that this problem is caused by the service partition on the
hard drive.
I don't know why but if there is no service partition everything goes fine.
Having the service partition causes d-i to not be able to detect the cdrom.
That's strange. Can you send
That's strange. Can you send us enough info about this service
partitionso we can try to set one up, and perhaps reprocude the bug?
Thepartition layout, partition type, and the first several kilobytes
ofsuch a partition might suffice to do it.
It's listed as a compaq service partition in
* tbm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-03 02:09]:
Can you please try the new beta4 from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ to see if these other
problems are still there?
Can you please try new images from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL
* Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-25 14:21]:
The prompting for the following floppy is not friendly. A polite
and verbose message can be added quite easily.
I think this has been done.
* Config network:
The host's name was not configured (known problem)
Fixed.
What happens if you go to a shell and manually try
to mount the CD?
I get a "not a directory"
error
Have you tried running the menu item that
checks a CD for validity?
Same Thing
Stephen T. Bellis wrote:
It doesn't matter what I do I can't get this machine to mount ANY cd to preform the
install.
I've tried several d-i cd's including older versions that worked previously.
I've also tried changing the cd drive to a HP 9900i with the same results.
If you have a CD
Package: installation-reportsINSTALL
REPORTDebian-installer-version: Daily Builds from 1-18, 4-9, 4.12, 4-15 and
beta 3uname -a:Linux athena 2.4.24.p4smp.1 #1 SMP Wed Feb 18 23:56:52 CST
2004 i686 GNU/LinuxDate: My last attempt was
todayMethod:netinstcd and business card
cdMachine:Intel
Jukka Neppius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Few hours ago I tried again with daily boot-floppies. I tried to
install unstable from ftp.fi.debian.org. Same result as earlier:
/usr/sbin/mkinird: Cannot determine root device
Failed to create initrd image.
dpkg: error processing
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040315
Debian-installer-version:
debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/20040315/images/floppy
Date: Fri Mar 19 19:25:04 EET 2004
Method: Boot from floppy. Packages from local md5sum tested partial mirror
Machine: A PC
Processor: K7 1.8 GHz
Memory:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Apparently beta3 has better SATA support. Can you try?
I did. :-P
Here's the lowdown: the installer basically works and installs the
system. Unfortunately I can't get either grub or lilo to work, so I
can't boot it.
This may have something to do with device mapping
Apparently beta3 has better SATA support. Can you try?
This may have something to do with device mapping in the BIOS -- I may
not be feeding the right information to lilo and/or grub. Or it may
have something to do with the fact that my system doesn't appear to have
a 'compatibility
elijah wright wrote:
Apparently beta3 has better SATA support. Can you try?
This may have something to do with device mapping in the BIOS -- I may
not be feeding the right information to lilo and/or grub. Or it may
have something to do with the fact that my system doesn't appear to have
a
About Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have similar setup as follows:
CPU: P4 1.6 GHz
Make:Myself
Chipset: i875/ICH5R
M/B: Gigabyte GA-8i875
PATA Primary: Maxtor 160 GBSlave: None
2ndary: LG GSA-4081B Slave Ymaha CRW-F1
SATA0: Seagate 160GB
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta2
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
** Disclaimer: The installer failed horribly and did not install any kernel
image at all. The kernel was install manually afterwards.
** Second
What about compiling in CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE? I wouldn't think that
it would hurt anything and it is required on older systems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote:
It seems that debootstrap from unstable is already aware of the
libdevmapper1.00 dependency. See
Two big problems, libdevmapper1.00 now needs to be installed,
Another system with a 120GB drive requires CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE
compiled into the kernel to see the entire drive.
I used the three floppy images (boot, root, net drivers) off the
business card iso from here.
Hello,
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:14:31AM -0600, David Fries wrote:
Two big problems, libdevmapper1.00 now needs to be installed,
Another system with a 120GB drive requires CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE
compiled into the kernel to see the entire drive.
I used the three floppy images (boot, root,
Herbert Xu wrote:
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card.
* It hangs on loading module ide-detect if RAID is disabled in the BIOS.
* If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never detects
either Serial ATA drive.
*
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 12:03]:
So it turns out, having installed Linux to the one drive which is
visible to Linux, that the BIOS won't boot from that drive. And I
can't
Boot from floppy or CD and use root=/dev/... or boot from the net via
PXE.
Or can you add a
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-18 18:44]:
Perhaps you didn't notice that I'm completely stuck on another matter (the
wget failure). Happy to try once I can work around that.
Put the drive in another PC and use debootstrap to create a base
system. Or install another distro, make a
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Boot from floppy or CD and use root=/dev/...
I don't think that works, you get the d-i initrd, which is not very good
at booting a regular debian system.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 12:43]:
Boot from floppy or CD and use root=/dev/...
I don't think that works, you get the d-i initrd, which is not very good
at booting a regular debian system.
Yeah, you'll need a special CD. However, this used to work with
woody - I really hope
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Yeah, you'll need a special CD. However, this used to work with
woody - I really hope we can make a rescue option which allows this.
It has been useful many times.
If we had a good and reasonably small rescue initrd, we could include it
on the CD easily.
--
see shy
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 13:12]:
If we had a good and reasonably small rescue initrd, we could include it
on the CD easily.
Yeah, but even booting without an initrd (from an existing
installation) should be possible.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 13:12]:
If we had a good and reasonably small rescue initrd, we could include it
on the CD easily.
Yeah, but even booting without an initrd (from an existing
installation) should be possible.
The standard debian install
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-20 12:03]:
So it turns out, having installed Linux to the one drive which is
visible to Linux, that the BIOS won't boot from that drive. And I
can't
Boot from floppy or CD and use root=/dev/... or boot from the net via
PXE.
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card.
* It hangs on loading module ide-detect if RAID is disabled in the BIOS.
* If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never detects
either Serial ATA drive.
* DHCP configuration
Herbert Xu wrote:
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card.
* It hangs on loading module ide-detect if RAID is disabled in the BIOS.
* If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never detects
either Serial ATA drive.
*
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-18 18:44]:
Perhaps you didn't notice that I'm completely stuck on another matter (the
wget failure). Happy to try once I can work around that.
Put the drive in another PC and use debootstrap to create a base
system. Or install another distro,
2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card.
* It hangs on loading module ide-detect if RAID is disabled in the BIOS.
* If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never detects
either Serial ATA drive.
* DHCP configuration is slow and flaky but eventually works.
*
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-17 19:15]:
2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card.
* If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never
detects either Serial ATA drive.
Does a standard 2.4 kernel normally work? Or do you have patches or 2.6?
--
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-17 20:26]:
the mysterious hang was much more disturbing.
I know. :/ Other people have experienced it as well (e.g. 224494),
but I don't think our kernel maintainer has looked at it yet.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-17 19:15]:
2 Serial ATA drives, 1 IDE drive, e1000 Ethernet card.
* If RAID is enabled in the BIOS, it gets past that, but it never
detects either Serial ATA drive.
Does a standard 2.4 kernel normally work? Or do you have
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/alpha/20040114/sarge-alpha-netinst.iso
uname -a: N/A
Date: 2004-01-15
Method: burned CD, booted with 'boot dqb0'
Machine: Compaq AlphaServer DS 10
Processor: ??? 600 MHz (can
Hi Szymon,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:58:47PM +0100, Szymon Juraszczyk wrote:
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/alpha/20040114/sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso
uname -a: N/A
Date: 2004-01-15
Method: burned CD, booted with 'boot dqb0'
Machine: Compaq
67 matches
Mail list logo
