Re: Kernel probs with ATA disk

2004-09-06 Thread Joey Hess
([EMAIL PROTECTED] may be an amusing reply-to, but it is not appropriate for this list. A great many posters on this list are not subscribers and I CC anyone I do not know is a subscriber.) John Summerfield wrote: I've just submitted two kernel bug reports that have the potential to be

Re: Kernel probs with ATA disk

2004-09-06 Thread John Summerfield
Joey Hess wrote: ([EMAIL PROTECTED] may be an amusing reply-to, but it is not appropriate for this list. A great many posters on this list are not subscribers and I CC anyone I do not know is a subscriber.) A great number of folk CC me without regard for what they know about me. It stands.

Re: Kernel probs with ATA disk

2004-09-06 Thread Joey Hess
John Summerfield wrote: A great number of folk CC me without regard for what they know about me. It stands. And you don't even set a proper Mail-Followup-To. plonk -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Kernel probs with ATA disk

2004-09-06 Thread John Summerfield
Joey Hess wrote: John Summerfield wrote: A great number of folk CC me without regard for what they know about me. It stands. And you don't even set a proper Mail-Followup-To. Settle down Joey. AFAIK my MUA doesn't offer the facility. It does allow me to make a choice that reduces the

Kernel probs with ATA disk

2004-09-05 Thread John Summerfield
I've just submitted two kernel bug reports that have the potential to be release-critical: 2.6.7 kernel can't detect my (new) ATA drive on my Pentium III system. See #270198 2.4.26-1-686 drives the ATA drive very slowly as it doesn't allow me to turn DMA on. See #270199 I've not tried d-i on