On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > the scripts first (I'll check them out of CVS probably tomorrow) to make
> > sure they don't already try that :-)
> >
> > > mklibs.py on the other hand includes each symbol only once. Theres a
> > > small hack to prefer libc sy
"Christopher C. Chimelis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8 Aug 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>
> > A short add on to mklibs.sh.
> >
> > As I see it it looks for symbols that are in two files, i.e. ash and
> > libm, and includes all matches. It thinks that all symbols that match
> > names will
On 8 Aug 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> A short add on to mklibs.sh.
>
> As I see it it looks for symbols that are in two files, i.e. ash and
> libm, and includes all matches. It thinks that all symbols that match
> names will be needed in the library.
>
> Unfortunatly that will keep any and
Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Christopher C. Chimelis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 7 Aug 2001, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, it acually doesn't seem to make any difference. With mklibs.sh:
> >
> > What exactly does this script do to libc (or really, what isn't it
Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Christopher C. Chimelis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 7 Aug 2001, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, it acually doesn't seem to make any difference. With mklibs.sh:
> >
> > What exactly does this script do to libc (or really, what isn't it
"Christopher C. Chimelis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Aug 2001, Falk Hueffner wrote:
>
> > Yes, it acually doesn't seem to make any difference. With mklibs.sh:
>
> What exactly does this script do to libc (or really, what isn't it
> doing now)? There are some binutils issues that I'm wo
On 7 Aug 2001, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Yes, it acually doesn't seem to make any difference. With mklibs.sh:
What exactly does this script do to libc (or really, what isn't it doing
now)? There are some binutils issues that I'm working on that may be
related...
C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > P. S. the mklibs.sh libm trick didn't seem to work
>
> Meaning -- didn't reduce far enough?
Yes, it acually doesn't seem to make any difference. With mklibs.sh:
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1743331 Aug 7 18:37 root.bin
total 4273
-rwxr-xr-x
8 matches
Mail list logo
