On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Now, in this case there is no need to move it, as looking at
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/no-standards-version-field.html shows
> that we do not see any of the D-I packages, so I assume lintian is
> detecting it properly and we do not need to m
On 11916 March 1977, Frans Pop wrote:
> Looks like it's named "nowayout".
Thats just because I didnt copy the very latest version of it over to
ries. Done now.
>> overridden. Those are tags corresponding to packaging errors serious
>> enough to mark a package unfit for the archive and should nev
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> The second category is named "error" and the tags listed can not be
Looks like it's named "nowayout".
> overridden. Those are tags corresponding to packaging errors serious
> enough to mark a package unfit for the archive and should never happen.
3 matches
Mail list logo
