Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:16:14 +0100
with message-id <20170228191614.gf5...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#853917: debian-installer: missing glyphs for Korean /
broken rendering
has caused the Debian Bug report #853917,
regarding debian-installer: missing glyphs for
On 28/02/17 08:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cyril Brulebois (2017-02-02):
>> Source: debian-installer
>> Version: 20160516
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: l10n
>>
>> (debian-l10n-kor...@lists.debian.org in X-Debbugs-Cc for informational
>> purposes; maybe someone there will find out what
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2017-02-02):
> Source: debian-installer
> Version: 20160516
> Severity: important
> Tags: l10n
>
> (debian-l10n-kor...@lists.debian.org in X-Debbugs-Cc for informational
> purposes; maybe someone there will find out what happened before someone
> from the installer team does
Source: debian-installer
Version: 20160516
Severity: important
Tags: l10n
(debian-l10n-kor...@lists.debian.org in X-Debbugs-Cc for informational
purposes; maybe someone there will find out what happened before someone
from the installer team does.)
Spotted by victory and mentioned on IRC: we're c
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:05:46AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Jamil,
> >
> > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:49:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jamil,
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:49:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:39:57AM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
>> >> >
Hi Jamil,
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:16:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> > I've noticed there are some missing glyph
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN [3];
> it'd be interesting to know if it's
Quoting Davide Viti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN [3];
> it'd be interesting to know if it's a font problem (missing glyph) or a
While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN [3];
it'd be interesting to know if it's a font problem (missing glyph) or an error
in the po file.
any hints from original transla
g from zh.ttf (and needed by zh_TW)
regards,
Davide
[1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/spellcheck/level1/index.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ttf-cjk-compact-udeb
Version: 1.5
All missing glyphs have been included with the upl
Package: ttf-cjk-compact-udeb
Version: 1.3
Tags: d-i
Checking the needed glyphs on the spellchecker page [1], looks like
the following glyphs are missing from ja.ttf files:
and the following are missing from zh.ttf (and needed by zh_TW)
regards,
Davide
[1] http://d-i.alioth.d
12 matches
Mail list logo
