Frans Pop writes:
> On Wednesday 24 December 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> It would be nice if you (or someone else) would then explain[1] why
>> having a limited set of d-i images + cd images which contained the
>> non-free firmware necessary for certain hardware to boot would be an
>> intractab
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Sure it does; it's a set of the initial media which contains the
> > non-free firmware in *addition* to the normal stuff contained on
> > the fully DFSG-free media. [You'd just need this for CD1, the
> > ne
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Sure it does; it's a set of the initial media which contains the
> non-free firmware in *addition* to the normal stuff contained on the
> fully DFSG-free media. [You'd just need this for CD1, the netinst,
> business card and cd images, and perhaps
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 December 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > It would be nice if you (or someone else) would then explain[1]
> > why having a limited set of d-i images + cd images which contained
> > the non-free firmware necessary for certain hardware to boot wou
On Wednesday 24 December 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> It would be nice if you (or someone else) would then explain[1] why
> having a limited set of d-i images + cd images which contained the
> non-free firmware necessary for certain hardware to boot would be an
> intractable solution. From where I
Switching from -vote to -boot and -cd.
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 December 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > 1: -vote really is the wrong list to discuss this on; Cc'ing debian-cd
> > so knowledgeable people there can tell me I'm on crack.
>
> Second of all, the analysis
6 matches
Mail list logo
