Hi,
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:27:17 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is that really true? If bin-nmus, which require finding and prodding one
> > of a small set of very busy people, are more maintenence cost than
> > managing one more udeb, we're doing somet
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
>> Actually, it is a lot cheaper than having another udeb to track from a
>> d-i RM point of view...
>
> Is that really true? If bin-nmus, which require finding and prodding one
> of a small set of very busy people, are more maintenence
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Actually, it is a lot cheaper than having another udeb to track from a
> d-i RM point of view...
Is that really true? If bin-nmus, which require finding and prodding one
of a small set of very busy people, are more maintenence cost than
managing one more udeb, we're doing so
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 03:07:15PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > Guido, could you try to link libaio statically to the multipath-tools
> > for the udeb?
>
> While doing this would be as easy as using "LDFLAGS += -Wl,-Bstatic
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:34:22AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Guido, could you try to link libaio statically to the multipath-tools
> for the udeb?
While doing this would be as easy as using "LDFLAGS += -Wl,-Bstatic
-laio -Wl,-Bdynamic" it kind of defeats the purpose of a shared library
comp
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 08:53:19AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> An extra package for a 3k lib?
>
> | 09:23 < Lunar^> waldi: Do you have other options to suggest about libaio?
> | 09:27 < waldi> link it static. the lib is not security sensitive
> | 09:2
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 08:53:19AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> An extra package for a 3k lib?
| 09:23 < Lunar^> waldi: Do you have other options to suggest about libaio?
| 09:27 < waldi> link it static. the lib is not security sensitive
| 09:29 < Lunar^> only multipath uses it at the moment, sou
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 08:53:19AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:05:13AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I've been asked to provide a udeb for libaio (#440320), which is
> > needed by the multipath udeb package. So I'd like to ask if it's fine
> > to provide such udeb?
>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:05:13AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I've been asked to provide a udeb for libaio (#440320), which is
> needed by the multipath udeb package. So I'd like to ask if it's fine
> to provide such udeb?
An extra package for a 3k lib?
Bastian
--
Either one of us, by himsel
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've been asked to provide a udeb for libaio (#440320), which is
> needed by the multipath udeb package. So I'd like to ask if it's fine
> to provide such udeb?
Yes, it's ok. We're still working at multipath support but it's doing
great progress
Hi,
I've been asked to provide a udeb for libaio (#440320), which is
needed by the multipath udeb package. So I'd like to ask if it's fine
to provide such udeb?
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo
