On Sunday 30 July 2006 19:37, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Sorry for the very long delay. I've uploaded new gtk+2.0 packages to
> unstable, with different names as planned. They are also rebuilt
> against DirectFB 0.9.25.
>
> They are currently sitting in NEW, but NEW processing is very fast
> these d
Le mercredi 05 juillet 2006 à 21:05 +0200, Frans Pop a écrit :
> This means that we can easily determine when to make the switch ourselves
> by setting the correct build dependencies.
>
> Hmm. Both the lib and -dev package probably still install the same files
> as the current gtk+2.0-directfb p
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 19:48, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > That would work. Can you do a proposal for the names you'd like to
> > use?
>
> I'd like to match the GTK+ names:
> libgtk2.0-directfb0
> libgtk2.0-directfb0-udeb
> libgtk2.0-directfb-dev
Looks fine. Feel free to upload with those names.
Le mercredi 05 juillet 2006 à 01:17 +0200, Frans Pop a écrit :
> On Tuesday 04 July 2006 10:18, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > How about uploading these packages with new names for the udebs? This
> > would allow us to fix those names at the same moment.
>
> That would work. Can you do a proposal for
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 10:18, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> How about uploading these packages with new names for the udebs? This
> would allow us to fix those names at the same moment.
That would work. Can you do a proposal for the names you'd like to use?
pgpS6jIpWKn62.pgp
Description: PGP signat
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 09:42:55AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> the only thing which needs building, AIUI is cdebconf(-gtk). The
> rest are already ok.
yes, cdebconf-gtk needs the patch below.
The other package which needs to be changed is rootskel-gtk where
src/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders h
Le lundi 03 juillet 2006 à 22:08 +0200, Frans Pop a écrit :
> The gtk2.0+directfb packages _do_ have the same names as existing
> packages, so for that a coordinated upload is necessary.
>
> AFAIK versioned conflicts are of no use for d-i. We just have to make sure
> that udebs that depend on th
On 03/07/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 11:51, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 19:21 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be
> > released.
>
> This has just happened. It has been uplo
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:08:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 03 July 2006 11:51, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Sometime during summer, GTK+ 2.10 should be released, with integrated
> > > DirectFB support.
> >
> > This has also happened.
>
> At one point you feel like you're waiting endle
On Monday 03 July 2006 11:51, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 19:21 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be
> > released.
>
> This has just happened. It has been uploaded to unstable today.
Hmm. I'm not totally happy
Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 19:21 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be released.
This has just happened. It has been uploaded to unstable today.
> Sometime during summer, GTK+ 2.10 should be released, with integrated
> DirectFB support.
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 20:06]:
> On Friday 30 June 2006 19:21, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > From now on, the d-i team will be able to work on the installer, basing
> > their work on these experimental packages. However this is not enough
> > to produce a release.
> >
> > In the next
On Friday 30 June 2006 19:21, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> From now on, the d-i team will be able to work on the installer, basing
> their work on these experimental packages. However this is not enough
> to produce a release.
>
> In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be released.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Following a decision that happened around Debconf, Attilio Fiandrotti
> and Eddy Petrişor have produced a patch that backports DirectFB supports
> into GTK+ 2.8.18 (the current version in unstable) without affecting the
> X11
There are some news about GTK+ packages, and this relates to both GNOME
and the debian-installer. I'll try to sum them up here. Please note that
this is only a proposal, which is meant to be discussed.
I. The past
Until now, the graphical installer has been using a specially patched
GTK+ version,
15 matches
Mail list logo
