> > -have localechooser trigger "apt-install localization-config" so that
> > the target system has it installed when it will need it
>
> Why use localechooser to do this? It seems much more logical to let the
> l-c udeb take care of this.
Yeah, probably. Proposing localechooser is indeed a le
Thanks for working on this.
On Saturday 02 September 2006 10:32, Christian Perrier wrote:
> The general plan is:
> -have localechooser trigger "apt-install localization-config" so that
> the target system has it installed when it will need it
Why use localechooser to do this? It seems much more
> Why use a menu entry for this at all, instead of a post-base-installer.d
> hook?
Actually, for one bad and one good reason:
-bad reason: post-base-installer hooks are not documented in
installer/doc/devel/available-hooks.txt
-good reason: at least during the debugging stage, I prefer having a
Christian Perrier wrote:
> -have a menu entry that reproduces what we had in base-config, ie
> mostly run "update-locale-config --preinst" to preseed things that
> need it (mostly dictionaries-common and X)
Why use a menu entry for this at all, instead of a post-base-installer.d
hook?
> The finis
The initial work to reintegrate l-c in D-I seems to give some good
results.
While I initially worked on a separate udeb in the people/ branch, I
think (and that seems shared) that this udeb should be generated by
the l-c source package.
So, I'm now in the process of merging my work in l-c itself.
5 matches
Mail list logo
