also sprach Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.28.0857 +0200]:
> I would like to make mdadm work equally well with both usages, and let
> system-integrators make the decisions :-)
> So anything I can do to make mdadm work more nicely for you I will
> seriously consider.
>
> --use-dev-subdir
I don't have much to add...
On Tuesday April 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Frans, all I know is documented in
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mdadm/mdadm.git;a=blob;f=debian/FAQ,
> item 3.
>
> Anything else, Neil (on Cc) will have to explain... full mail
> further down, with more inline comments
also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.22.1843 +0200]:
> I suspect that should have read /dev/md$MD_NUM.
Of course. :)
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http:/
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> > What we do for new RAID devices is:
> > mdadm --create /dev/md/$MD_NUM --auto=yes --force -R -l > spec>
>
> That's the problem. You should be able to change that to md/$MD_NUM
> and then just use mdX everywhere without much trouble.
I suspect
also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.22.1820 +0200]:
> What's responsible for creating them: udev or mdadm itself?
mdadm.
> We do. The superblock is version-0, but mdcfg does use /dev/md/X (and has
> done since its original upload in 2004).
>
> What we do for new RAID devices is:
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Partman currently prefers the use of /dev/md/X and uses that when
> > creating new RAID devices. This results in both /dev/md/X and /dev/mdX
> > block device files being created.
>
> The latter should be symlinks.
Hmm. They are not, at least not
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> Here are some of the inconsistencies I've noticed:
> - /dev/mdX and /dev/md/X are created with different permissions
Forgot to specify that. At least in D-I I see that /dev/mdX is owned by
root:root, while /dev/md/X is owned by root:disk.
signature.a
Frans, all I know is documented in
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mdadm/mdadm.git;a=blob;f=debian/FAQ,
item 3.
Anything else, Neil (on Cc) will have to explain... full mail
further down, with more inline comments from me.
also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.22.1725 +0200]:
> Hi Marti
(Please reply to debian-boot; reply-to set.)
Hi Martin,
Over the past few weeks I've solved several issues in D-I related to the use
of /dev/mdX versus /dev/md/X and I've been wondering what the official
status is of both as it seems there are at least some inconsistencies.
Partman currently p
9 matches
Mail list logo
