Ian Campbell wrote:
Is there a way to contact the build machine maintainers? Other than
hoping they read this thread?
The overview shows who they are. Ping on IRC, private mail, ...
Note that the powerpc issue is not for the buildd admin (although it's
possible that needs updating too).
--
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 15:00 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I was unable to reproduce in an uptodate i386 sid chroot. I'm not sure
which environment these builds occur, maybe it's a testing thing?
No, daily images get build in a sid environment.
Thanks for making an effort to look into this.
On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
Thanks. I still cannot reproduce so I am somewhat clutching at straws. I
compared the logs for a local (successful) i386 run of the daily-build
script vs. the logs from
On Monday 26 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
If you cannot reproduce it with an up-to-date sid build environment then
it's quite possible that the buildds are simply outdated.
apt and dpkg are not really relevant here. More relevant are versions of
mklibs itself and packages like binutils.
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:55 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Thanks for making an effort to look into this.
On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
Thanks. I still cannot reproduce so I am somewhat clutching at straws. I
compared the logs for a local (successful) i386 run of the daily-build
On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I tried downgrading binutils, as you suggested in your next mail, to
2.19.91.20091006-1 from testing and still saw no issues.
Hmmm. Another option is that it's due to a libc version skew.
During a build libc6 is copied from the host system
On Monday 26 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
After updating the system the problem disappears. So, that confirms the
reason is outdated buildd environments after an API change in libc (2.9
- 2.10). The first 2.10 upload was 18 Okt, so the problem should be
only about a week old.
s/API/ABI/
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:14 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 26 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I tried downgrading binutils, as you suggested in your next mail, to
2.19.91.20091006-1 from testing and still saw no issues.
Hmmm. Another option is that it's due to a libc version skew.
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 06:32 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Looks to me that the general state of builds is rather pathetic ATM:
Sorry. I should have just written Looks like there are quite a few
problems with builds ATM. Does not change the facts or the likelyhood of
a successful upload/release
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I was unable to reproduce in an uptodate i386 sid chroot. I'm not sure
which environment these builds occur, maybe it's a testing thing?
No, daily images get build in a sid environment.
powerpc is failing differently with
E: Couldn't
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I only checked the first failure for each arch but this same failure
seems to have effected mips (build_r4k-ip22_cdrom), s390 (build_generic)
and armel (uild_iop32x_netboot_glantank).
For mips and mipsel there's a much bigger problem: there have
Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
I only checked the first failure for each arch but this same failure
seems to have effected mips (build_r4k-ip22_cdrom), s390 (build_generic)
and armel (uild_iop32x_netboot_glantank).
For mips and mipsel there's a much bigger
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
For mips and mipsel there's a much bigger problem: there have not been
any builds at all since early July. It looks as if some of the central
D-I buildds are simply not being managed.
Wrong, ssh is/was broken on mips* so the
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
For mips and mipsel there's a much bigger problem: there have not
been any builds at all since early July. It looks as if some of the
central D-I buildds are simply not being
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Wrong, ssh is/was broken on mips* so the results did not get uploaded,
but the builds were not interrupted.
I guess you're referring to #538313?
That bug was fixed on Okt 5, but the current situation, 20 days later, is
that we still don't have daily
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Links to current images are available from:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Cheers,
FJP
Hmmm... If I follow that link, then click on
• netinst ... and businesscard ... CD
Looks to me that the general state of builds is rather pathetic ATM:
Sorry. I should have just written Looks like there are quite a few
problems with builds ATM. Does not change the facts or the likelyhood of
a successful upload/release any time soon though.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
17 matches
Mail list logo
