On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I don't recall having ever threatened you of "enforcement" or with the
> > "tech-ctte". I recall I did claim people should bring it to the ctte
> > if they disagree with my decision at the end of the discussion though,
> > as I did again lately.
> The
Loïc Minier wrote:
> I don't recall having ever threatened you of "enforcement" or with the
> "tech-ctte". I recall I did claim people should bring it to the ctte
> if they disagree with my decision at the end of the discussion though,
> as I did again lately.
They were in the mail I replied
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> >In the end, the package doesn't get installed currently despite this
> > being the wish of the package maintainer. I'm not sure this is a good
> > situation, and I'm not too happy that I can't enforce my decision.
> It might help if you mentioned it
Loïc Minier wrote:
>In the end, the package doesn't get installed currently despite this
> being the wish of the package maintainer. I'm not sure this is a good
> situation, and I'm not too happy that I can't enforce my decision.
It might help if you mentioned it to me. Without using loade
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> We're not ignoring them everywhere. Aptitude installs recommends by
> default for newly installed packages after the initial install, which
> does provide some exposure to catch bad recommends.
I was pointing out that avoiding the problem was not going to
Loïc Minier wrote:
> The situation of Recommends in the archive is not going to improve if
> we ignore them everywhere though.
We're not ignoring them everywhere. Aptitude installs recommends by
default for newly installed packages after the initial install, which
does provide some exposure to c
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> FYI, it's not a bug in tasksel that it ignores recommends.
Well, let's call it a bug *and* a workaround at the same time then. :)
The situation of Recommends in the archive is not going to improve if
we ignore them everywhere though.
> If on one glori
FYI, it's not a bug in tasksel that it ignores recommends.
If on one glorious day, it's possible to install even with recommands
and get a sane system without mounds of unnecessary stuff being pulled
in by recommends and/or recommends chains, I will reconsider this
position. Not until then though.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 387049 -1
Bug#387049: Please add dependency on libgnomevfs2-bin to
gnome-desktop-environment
Bug 387049 cloned as bug 388290.
> reassign -1 tasksel
Bug#388290: Please add dependency on libgnomevfs2-bin to
gnome-desktop-environment
Bug reassigne
9 matches
Mail list logo
