On Tuesday 06 March 2007 00:30, Joey Hess wrote:
> We do link to directories for everything except the netinst and
> businesscard. I think it would be reasonable to link to the directory
> for those now (there may have been problems doing that before due to
> the layout).
Done. I have long felt my
Uwe Dippel wrote:
>My excuses if you read this as hostile. Ways to express oneself are
>different.
Means of self-expression that don't include terms like "fscking
unintelligent" tend to have better results.
>my suggestion would be to link to the directory instead to the file.
We do l
> Updating the links on a daily basis synchronised with CD builds is
> unfortunately not possible given the design of the Debian website.
would it be possible soloution to make the links on the debian-installer page
point to a page hosted on the cdimage server (and therefore able to updated by
th
On Mar 5, 2007, at 5:40 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Something wrong with rsync? I think zsync can also be used.
zsync works great. It doesn't work with DVD images -- something
about files larger than 2GB (31 bit byte offsets).
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
peter green wrote:
> This is a problem though, using symlinks for the downloads like this
> rather than just updating the links essentially means that any user
> who doesn't pay carefull attention to how things are done and has a
> long download containing resumes (e.g. a user who has a slow and
>
> > Be fscking intelligent and *leave* a download for everyone to
> pick it up,
> > before you replace it.
> > Leave older versions in separate directories and just change
> the link to it.
>
> Be fscking intelligent and try this:
>
> wget
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily
Op 05-03-2007 om 23:15 schreef Uwe Dippel:
>
> What next ?
Choose:
a) Reply http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2007/03/msg00118.html
b) Follow up http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2007/03/msg00119.html
c) Something other that a good community member would do.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
P.S
Here I get
$ md5sum debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
07b6034367c171526c4fbcdf0851162c debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
166703104 Byte, downloaded with wget
Funny, though, that it runs properly for all the rest of the install. I
went through until the network was to be configured.
I'll try anoth
Although such a hostile message deserves no reply, I point out for
others who may not know it that [1]upstream of the arch-latest directory
one finds exactly the structure described above. It's been that way for
years, as I used it to follow Sarge development.
My excuses if you read this as ho
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 00:26:45 +0800, "Uwe Dippel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Be fscking intelligent and *leave* a download for everyone to pick it up,
>before you replace it.
>Leave older versions in separate directories and just change the link to it.
Although such a hostile message deserves no
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Be fscking intelligent and *leave* a download for everyone to pick it up,
> before you replace it.
> Leave older versions in separate directories and just change the link to it.
Be fscking intelligent and try this:
wget
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/d
On 3/4/07, Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll try another download.
Which takes around one day in MY ... .
No, sorry, I'll never get it, ever. This is just silly: while I am
downloading you guys upload the latest version, and then wget switches the
length.
--17:18:44--
http://c
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Eddy Petrior wrote:
> Also note that will have to change the sources *after* you installed
> sarge and that would mean extra traffic (if you prefer to install a
> full desktop task, the sarge packages will be downloaded, then the
> new ones will too). Changing before will proba
On Sunday 04 March 2007 08:47, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Now I think to stick with it, install it, change the sources.list. It
> should result in just the same Etch, right ?
No, not quite. For example, the system will still be using legacy
encodings while a newly installer system will use UTF-8. Eddy p
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On 3/4/07, Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I
>> I'll try another download.
>
>
> Which takes around one day in MY ... .
>
> Just for curiosity, I used the real(== from CDROM) Sarge-netinstaller of
> years ago. It goes through smoothly.
> Now I think to stick with
On 3/4/07, Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I
I'll try another download.
Which takes around one day in MY ... .
Just for curiosity, I used the real(== from CDROM) Sarge-netinstaller of
years ago. It goes through smoothly.
Now I think to stick with it, install it, change the sources.list
I checked the md5 and compared it with the website. It is different.
Here I get
$ md5sum debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
07b6034367c171526c4fbcdf0851162c debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
166703104 Byte, downloaded with wget
Funny, though, that it runs properly for all the rest of the install. I w
Debian->Debian ?
I should have said that here it is OpenSolaris->Debian.
I don't have to hammer on the fact that qemu -cdrom DSL.iso *does* 'eth0
detected, broadcast ...'; and dmesg finds RTL-8029 just fine. Started in the
same terminal, just one line down from the non-.working netinstaller.
Uwe
On Sunday 04 March 2007 02:35, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso (20070303) does not 'see' the eth0
> offered by qemu. I have checked with dmesg | grep eth0, it is empty. It
> is no qemu problem, since in all other images I use: KNOPPIX, DSL, ...
> eth0, comes up properly. On the
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Subject says it:
> debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso (20070303) does not 'see' the eth0 offered
> by qemu. I have checked with dmesg | grep eth0, it is empty. It is no qemu
> problem, since in all other images I use: KNOPPIX, DSL, ... eth0, comes up
> properly. On the .iso as well
20 matches
Mail list logo
