Re: modconf maintainance - status and future?

2004-08-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:22:57PM +0100, peter green wrote: i would leave the code old in the old repostry so the old history is preserved That's what cvs2svn is for ... -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: modconf maintainance - status and future?

2004-08-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:56:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Frank Lichtenheld wrote: 2) If there are actually some people interested in this (I am, so that if is superfluous) should the program still located in the debian-boot CVS and have debian-boot as maintainer address? I don't see

RE: modconf maintainance - status and future?

2004-08-01 Thread peter green
: Re: modconf maintainance - status and future? On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:56:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Frank Lichtenheld wrote: 2) If there are actually some people interested in this (I am, so that if is superfluous) should the program still located in the debian-boot CVS and have

Re: modconf maintainance - status and future?

2004-07-28 Thread Joey Hess
Frank Lichtenheld wrote: 2) If there are actually some people interested in this (I am, so that if is superfluous) should the program still located in the debian-boot CVS and have debian-boot as maintainer address? I don't see any reason for modconf to remain associated with this list unless