> On the positive side: we've gained support for Marathi.
s/Gujarati/Marathi
Marathi had been accidentally enabled but the translations are
currently all fuzzy. I disabled it along with Xhosa and Belarusian,
yesterday. There is nearly no chance that Marathi gets activated as it
started very late
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> s/Gujarati/Marathi
>
> Gujarati is now out of danger, thanks to the effort of Kartik Mistry.
>
> Hindi is also now safe, thanks to the deep involvment of Nishant
> Sharma.
Thanks to Christian for his encouragement and T
Frans Pop wrote:
=== D-I STRING FREEZE: Thu 12 Okt, 00:00 UTC - Sun 22 Okt, 00:00 UTC ===
Hi folks,
This mail really should have gone out at least two and probably three
weeks earlier. Blame goes to the discussions on d-{private,vote,wherever}
which resulted in a serious drop in my motivation
(Please always delete text from the mail you reply to that is not relevant
for your reply. And please limit such a discussion to only the relevant
mailing list, i.e. d-boot; AFAIK Loïc reads d-boot, so not CC'ing him.)
On Sunday 08 October 2006 20:33, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> In the latter ca
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Just today mike emmel fixed the "boom" bug, it should technically
> possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this here for other readers: 2.10.6-2 in experimental was
uploaded today with the fix.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To
On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Just today mike emmel fixed the "boom" bug, it should technically
> possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this here for other readers: 2.10.6-2 in experimental was
uploaded today with th
Le mardi 10 octobre 2006 à 07:18 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
> On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> > > Just today mike emmel fixed the "boom" bug, it should technically
> > > possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
> >
> > R
On 10/10/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current plan is to ship GNOME 2.14 in etch [1]. This was a hard
decision to make, but we prefer shipping a rock-solid and polished 2.14
version rather than a buggy 2.16 version with which Ubuntu is having
many issues.
[1] http://oskur
Hi Frans,
Glad to see you back up and about on Debian lists. :)
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:40:08AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> GENERAL STATUS
> ==
> The most important work planned for RC1 has been done and the installer in
> general works well, although some finishing touches and test
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:07PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would very much like to see 2.6.18 in testing for rc1. Looking at the bug
> page, I don't really see any indication that 2.6.18 is a regression overall
> wrt 2.6.17, so aside from sorting out the hppa build failure, I would say
>
On Friday 13 October 2006 17:50, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:07PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I would very much like to see 2.6.18 in testing for rc1. Looking at
> > the bug page, I don't really see any indication that 2.6.18 is a
> > regression overall wrt 2.6.17, so
Hi Christian,
Hi Frans,
As I have been on a long vacation (with no wifi unlike Mexico,
unfortunately), I have not managed to report the activity at Georgian
DI translations earlier.
We have distributed the DI file on online translation tool so more
people can participate and hope to get the file
> As I have been on a long vacation (with no wifi unlike Mexico,
> unfortunately), I have not managed to report the activity at Georgian
> DI translations earlier.
:-)
>
> We have distributed the DI file on online translation tool so more
> people can participate and hope to get the file done i
13 matches
Mail list logo