Daily build aggregator (2013-09-20):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds: [ many ]
We know there's apt's #723705, so I've decronned the build aggregator for now.
Mraw,
KiBi.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.
On 17/09/13 00:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> The "Err" issue while downloading some files ("21: Is a directory") only
> appears on kfreebsd AFAICT, so might be an arch-specific issue.
I saw it happen on Linux i386 too. I now realise the buildd log URIs
are not valid for very long (could /daily/ be
Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-11):
> Christian PERRIER (2013-09-05):
> > So, no mirror problem, fine. Then, what problem?
>
> I've just reproduced this issue locally (using make rebuild_netboot-gtk
> under build/). This doesn't appear to be related to the recent (last 2
> months) apt updates, since I
Hi,
On 12/09/13 01:53, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Steven Chamberlain
> wrote:
>> Does this change seem odd to you too? I wondered if it could be causing
>> recent failures of APT to download required debs for d-i builds:
>
> Looking at:
> http://d-i.debian.o
APT seems to be misbehaving on other architectures too:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot-xen.log
> Err http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer
> xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-udeb i386 1:0.4.3-2
> Could not open file
> /build/installer-PBPsQ7/build
Christian PERRIER (2013-09-05):
> So, no mirror problem, fine. Then, what problem?
I've just reproduced this issue locally (using make rebuild_netboot-gtk
under build/). This doesn't appear to be related to the recent (last 2
months) apt updates, since I'm running 0.9.9.4 on this (slightly
outdat
Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org):
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 07:02:06AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > I wonder why a build machine is using a mirror in Greece. I'd bet the
> > build machine is *not* in Greece.
>
> Why? Because you think Greece has no money left to run buildds?
Well, s
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 07:00:13PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
> > On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 07:02 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
> > >
> > > > > Still, this package seems to be provided by the lin
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
> On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 07:02 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
> >
> > > > Still, this package seems to be provided by the linux source
> > > > package.
> > >
> > > No, I haven't touched speakup.
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 07:02:06AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I wonder why a build machine is using a mirror in Greece. I'd bet the
> build machine is *not* in Greece.
Why? Because you think Greece has no money left to run buildds?
http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=barber
Kind regard
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 07:02 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
>
> > > Still, this package seems to be provided by the linux source package.
> >
> > No, I haven't touched speakup. And in that log APT says:
> >
> > > The following NEW packages wil
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
> > Still, this package seems to be provided by the linux source package.
>
> No, I haven't touched speakup. And in that log APT says:
>
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> [...]
> > sound-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di speakup-module
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 07:00 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
>
> > * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Sep 03 00:05 buildd@barber build_netboot-gtk
> >
> > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log
>
>
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Sep 03 00:05 buildd@barber build_netboot-gtk
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log
Needed speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di not found (looked in
apt.udeb/cach
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * OLD BUILD:ia64 May 26 00:12 buildd@alkman build_cdrom
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_cdrom
Christian PERRIER (09/06/2013):
> Is there anything I can do (understand: something a dumb bubulle cacn
> do) to fix these recurrent build failures?
Thanks for you offer. :)
Unfortunately, one of the blockers is getting a linux kernel built
everywhere. Currently, linux-image-3.9-1-$arch is lacki
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
Is there anything I can do (understand: something a dumb bubulle cacn
do) to fix these recurrent build failures?
signature.asc
Descripti
Daily build aggregator (21/05/2013):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * OLD BUILD:amd64 May 19 00:05 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.l
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Is there a problem with buildd fano?
There was som "fun" recently at UBC (where fano and finzi lieve) and
later on the local package mirror there died so if things are now fine
again, don't worry.
> On 23/03/13 01:00, Daily build aggregator wrote:
>> Failed or o
Hi Christoph,
Is there a problem with buildd fano?
On 23/03/13 01:00, Daily build aggregator wrote:
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Mar 21 00:35 buildd@fano build_cdrom_grub
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_grub.
>Debian installer build overview
>---
>
>Failed or old builds:
>
>* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 18 21:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2sidsource
>http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2sidsource
>
>* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 18 21:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2wheezysou
Hi Hector
Hector Oron writes:
> Hello,
>
> 2013/2/3 Gaudenz Steinlin :
>
>> It seems that the build deamon (ancina) that was building the d-i images
>> for armel is currently down. Do you have any updates on what's happening
>> or could you please move the build to another host if the failure i
Hello,
2013/2/3 Gaudenz Steinlin :
> It seems that the build deamon (ancina) that was building the d-i images
> for armel is currently down. Do you have any updates on what's happening
> or could you please move the build to another host if the failure is
> expected to last longer.
ancina has
Dear armel buildd maintainers
It seems that the build deamon (ancina) that was building the d-i images
for armel is currently down. Do you have any updates on what's happening
or could you please move the build to another host if the failure is
expected to last longer.
The last d-i build happene
In article you write:
>Debian installer build overview
>---
>
>Failed or old builds:
>
>* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jan 22 22:57 debian-cd@pettersson sidamd64
>http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/sidamd64
>
>* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jan 22 22:57 debian-cd@pe
Hi,
On Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Yes. It's been a couple of days since the last failure. But, as usual,
> one never notices when things are again working as expected..:-)
there is a jenkins job checking this:
http://jenkins.debian.net/view/d-i_misc/job/d-i_parse_build_
Le 22/01/2013 12:11, Philipp Kern a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:41:27PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 18/01/13 19:36, Philipp Kern wrote:
rem% ls -al ~buildd/
ls: cannot access /home/buildd/: No such file or directory
Oh. Could a /home partition or network share be not mounted?
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:41:27PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 18/01/13 19:36, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > rem% ls -al ~buildd/
> > ls: cannot access /home/buildd/: No such file or directory
>
> Oh. Could a /home partition or network share be not mounted?
>
> The machines database still ca
On 18/01/13 19:36, Philipp Kern wrote:
> rem% ls -al ~buildd/
> ls: cannot access /home/buildd/: No such file or directory
Oh. Could a /home partition or network share be not mounted?
The machines database still calls it a mipsel buildd, and before the
outage it was responsible for the nightly d
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:48:22PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 18/01/13 07:03, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > On 18/01/13 05:49, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> >> Are there any news? We apparently had no D-I build for mipsel since
> >> Jan 10th.
> >
> > rem is back since Monday.
>
> Thanks M
On 18/01/13 07:03, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On 18/01/13 05:49, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Are there any news? We apparently had no D-I build for mipsel since
>> Jan 10th.
>
> rem is back since Monday.
Thanks Martin,
Please could mipsel porters or wb-team see why the nightly d-i builds on
rem
rem is back since Monday.
Christian PERRIER schrieb:
>Quoting Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@ftbfs.de):
>
>> > > Strangely the logs do not make the error obvious, at least to me.
>> >
>> > Isn't that the old build log? From when the last build happened,
>i.e.
>> > no error?
>>
>> i needed to shu
Quoting Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@ftbfs.de):
> > > Strangely the logs do not make the error obvious, at least to me.
> >
> > Isn't that the old build log? From when the last build happened, i.e.
> > no error?
>
> i needed to shut down some hardware at our hosting MAN-DA due to an
> error in the
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org):
> Hi,
>
> On 13/01/13 06:41, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> >> * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10 00:10 buildd@rem
> >> build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
> >>
> >> http://d-i
Hi,
On Sun Jan 13, 2013 at 17:11:11 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13/01/13 06:41, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> >> * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10 00:10 buildd@rem
> >> build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
> >>
Hi,
On 13/01/13 06:41, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
>> * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10 00:10 buildd@rem
>> build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
>>
>> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_se
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10 00:10 buildd@rem
> build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-imag
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Nov 03 00:20 buildd@barber build_hd-media
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/bui
Hello,
we've received this:
Daily build aggregator (05/09/2012):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: s390 Sep 05 00:01 buildd@zandonai build_generic
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
This failed builds are due to the newly uploaded hw-detect having
pending changes that were requiring udpkg > 1.14. However, that
version o
Hi,
2012/5/18 Daily build aggregator :
> * OLD BUILD: armel May 08 08:10 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log
Apologies guys, but ancina.d.o doing d-i dailies is down. We are
trying to contact local admi
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:50:37 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:38:52AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
> > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > >
> > > > Duno if this is a transient probl
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:38:52AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> >
> > > Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about
> > > in deep.
> >
> > It's not,
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> > Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about
> > in deep.
>
> It's not, and you should.
Nobody did, as of now. I'm on holidays right now, with few time
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about
> in deep.
It's not, and you should.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
Seem to be caused by this:
Building dependency tree...
Installing libc6-udeb as Depends of libasound2-udeb
libglib2.0-udeb:i386 Depend
Please do not send bug reports
---
On 3 Mar 2012 at 1:00, Daily build aggregator wrote:
Date sent: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:00:03 +
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject:Debian installer build: failed or old
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo (el...@debianpt.org):
> i386 failing with:
>
> cp: cannot stat
> `/org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/d-i/d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/cdrom/initrd.gz':
> No such file or directory
> FAILED: error 1
> Failed to start disc 1, error 256
> make: *** [im
i386 failing with:
cp: cannot stat
`/org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/d-i/d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/cdrom/initrd.gz':
No such file or directory
FAILED: error 1
Failed to start disc 1, error 256
make: *** [image-trees] Error 9
...and amd64 failing with:
E: Unable to
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:16:37AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> > Debian installer build overview
> > ---
> >
> > Failed or old builds:
>
>
> Houston, we have a problem.
Hopefully, this will be fix
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
Houston, we have a problem.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
A Terça, 18 de Outubro de 2011 02:00:04 Daily build aggregator você escreveu:
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Oct 18 00:11 buildd@fano build_cdrom
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-image
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 19:00, Hector Oron wrote:
> I really fail to see what's wrong on this build and also the cdimage ones.
> Is daily build aggregator playing with us? :-)
The log seems incomplete. Maybe space constraints in the builder?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. S
Hello,
2011/8/30 Daily build aggregator :
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: armel Aug 29 06:18 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
My fault..:-)... I anticipated the renaming of ttf-farsiweb-udeb to
fonts-farsiweb-udebbut the new package is waiting in NEW.
signa
Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org):
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:34:25AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> > d-i autobuilding already moved to ancina, we just need someone with
> > enough permissions (Phil or Christian) to set the ssh key exchange at
> > ravel.d.o
>
> I added it, please test.
It
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * OLD BUILD:armel Aug 09 17:32 buildd@alain build_iop32x_netboot
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/dail
Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@debian.org):
> Does anyone know what's going on here? The logs show:
>
> debian-installer git tree head: e93d4f4b527c4a85e81a06fb0a8c6fc0536ae37d
>
> ... which is from 15 July. Clearly the build tree isn't getting updated
> for some reason, but I don't know why
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 01:00:03AM +, Daily build aggregator wrote:
> * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 12 00:06 buildd@rem
> build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log
>
> * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 12 00
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 03:00, Daily build aggregator
wrote:
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jul 30 00:05 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/bu
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jun 30 00:08 buildd@rem
> build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-imag
Hi,
2011/6/27 Daily build aggregator :
> * OLD BUILD: armel Jun 21 18:50 buildd@alain build_iop32x_netboot
Some issues with alain.d.o prevented this to be fixed sooner, should
be fixed by today.
Best regards,
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
-- Would
Daily build aggregator wrote:
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 (…)
>
> * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-i386 (…)
I plea guilty for those two: I uploaded win32-loader 0.7.2 yesterday and it
has obviously no
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
For those who care: that was a manual run...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:59:35AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> > Debian installer build overview
> > ---
> >
> > Failed or old builds:
> >
> > * FAILED BUILD: hppa May 19 06:00 didaily@c3700 build_c
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: hppa May 19 06:00 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom
> Insufficient extends free in the LVM volume group, as always. Fixed now.
Oh, great. /me crosses fingers for a completely error-free daily build
for the next day...:-)
Thanks for all this work, Phil.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2011-05-11, Daily build aggregator wrote:
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_generic
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log
>
> *
Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org):
> oops, how about now?
You made it. Thanks, Dann..
Now we only have to sort out the issue with mipsel and everything will
be fine again.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 05:32:49PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org):
>
> > > And how about hppa builds?
> > >
> > > IIRC, hppa is now only supported in unstable, so that may explain why
> > > D-I daily builds are no longer run. Am I right?
> >
> > oops - p
Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org):
> > And how about hppa builds?
> >
> > IIRC, hppa is now only supported in unstable, so that may explain why
> > D-I daily builds are no longer run. Am I right?
>
> oops - powered down my hppa box before i went out of town. It should
> be back up & daily b
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 08:51:08AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> > Debian installer build overview
> > ---
> >
> > Failed or old builds:
> >
> > * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 03 23:16 joey@box build_orion
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 03 23:16 joey@box build_orion5x_network-console
>
> http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/arme
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> * daily mipsel images build:
> The build daemon responsible for these builds is currently moving to a
> new hosting location. Daily builds should be available again within the
> first two weeks of 2011.
Is this still true? We maybe
Hi,
A Sexta 25 Fevereiro 2011 01:00:03 Daily build aggregator você escreveu:
[...]
> * FAILED BUILD: s390 Feb 25 00:02 buildd@zandonai build_generic
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log
>
> * FAILED BUILD: s390 Feb 25 00:02 buildd@zandonai build_t
Thanks to the action of the kfreebsd porters, the situation of D-I
builds improved significantly.
We should now try to get status about other things mentioned in this
daily report:
- hppa: if I'm correct, this arch is not longer a release arch. As a
consequence, there doesn't seem to be any D-I b
Hi,
At Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:33:50 +0900,
Yasuhiro Araki wrote:
> Kmuto,
> I find latest 149.20.20.135 in returning query as follows,
>
> ksw.araki.net:
> Sun Feb 06 01:46:53 +0900 2011
> 74.125.38.81:ok:deb.cdn.araki.net:USA:128.226.116.176 149.20.20.135
>
> osdn2.debian.net:
> Sun Jan 23 06:26:4
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:29:38AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezepowerpc
>> http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezepowerpc
>>
>> * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson Csqueezepowerpc
>
Joey,
Thanks for reporting.
Kmuto,
I find latest 149.20.20.135 in returning query as follows,
ksw.araki.net:
Sun Feb 06 01:46:53 +0900 2011
74.125.38.81:ok:deb.cdn.araki.net:USA:128.226.116.176 149.20.20.135
osdn2.debian.net:
Sun Jan 23 06:26:40 +0900 2011
67.195.111.183:ok:deb.cdn.araki.net:US
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > * FAILED BUILD: armel Feb 09 22:18 joey@box
> > build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e.log
>
> These do fail because of:
>
> Ign http://cdn.debian.net
We have a bunch of recent failed builds for D-I images ATM:
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
(sent daily to -boot)
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * FAILED BUILD: armel Feb 09 22:18 joey@box
> bui
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
> Debian installer build overview
> ---
>
> Failed or old builds:
>
> * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdro
On 2011-01-13, Daily build aggregator wrote:
> * daily sparc images build:
> Due to the lack of porter and buildd admin interest there are currently no
> daily
> builds for the SPARC architecture. These builds will be reenable as soon as
> someone finds the time to do the necessary buildd setup.
> I commited the change that caused these mails. I'm a bit unsure to
> whicht address to change the "From" header. Do you think it's
> better to use something like
> "Daily build aggregator "?
I guess so. This makes it more "agnostic" I think.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-m
Excerpts from Joey Hess's message of Die Nov 09 19:55:48 +0100 2010:
> Can whoever (Geert I guess) caused these mails to be sent please fix
> them so they appear to come from a role address, not whoever is running
> the script?
I commited the change that caused these mails. I'm a bit unsure to
whi
Excerpts from Joey Hess's message of Die Nov 09 19:58:25 +0100 2010:
> Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > I'm a bit confused where this mail comes from. Today I activated the
> > script that generates this sort of mail on d-i.d.o (aka ravel). There
> > is also a cronjob for the d-i user that runs the scri
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I'm a bit confused where this mail comes from. Today I activated the
> script that generates this sort of mail on d-i.d.o (aka ravel). There
> is also a cronjob for the d-i user that runs the script daily at
> 00:30. But on ravel the current time is 21:33, so the script sh
Can whoever (Geert I guess) caused these mails to be sent please fix
them so they appear to come from a role address, not whoever is running
the script?
"Joey Hess" wrote:
> Debian installer build overview
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi
I'm a bit confused where this mail comes from. Today I activated the
script that generates this sort of mail on d-i.d.o (aka ravel). There
is also a cronjob for the d-i user that runs the script daily at
00:30. But on ravel the current time is 21:33, so the script should
not have been run yet.
89 matches
Mail list logo
