On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:45:03PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/08/18 14:57 "Christopher Chavez" <2000...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1. Is it the case that the only reason for having a separate /boot was to
> > provide easy access /boot/grub? I.e., was it intentional to provide easy
>
2014/08/18 14:57 "Christopher Chavez" <2000...@gmail.com>:
>
> (Please let me know if there's a better venue for collecting feedback for
this
> idea, or additional ones I should solicit feedback from. I primarily use
Ubuntu,
> but I assume this is as upstream as it gets.)
Upstream relative to what
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 00:40 -0500, Christopher Chavez wrote:
> (Please let me know if there's a better venue for collecting feedback for this
> idea, or additional ones I should solicit feedback from. I primarily use
> Ubuntu,
> but I assume this is as upstream as it gets.)
>
> Background:
>
> I
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:40:13AM -0500, Christopher Chavez wrote:
>
> 2. Would it be a better idea to only have /boot/grub, instead of /boot, on a
> separate partition? (I can confirm that it works both when installing and in
> existing setups, i.e. grub-install and update-grub both work as expe
4 matches
Mail list logo